
HarleyTwinFlame
@HarleyTwinFlame
9 Years1,000+ Posts
Comments: 96 · Posts: 1833 · Topics: 28



Posted by tizianiI'm too slow... 😛
1. It's your choice, it's mostly trial and error at first. The modern types based it on aspects (commonly the widest acceptable orb is usually around 10 degs max for the strongest aspects, conjunction and opposition, then gets smaller with others) but I've never found basing it on aspects made any big difference. Traditional astrologers base it on the size of the planet
and its moiety (the light it carries) I have seen orbs as wide as 17 degs for the biggest planets if you go down that route.
2. The wider the orb, the weaker the interaction between the planets involved because it's not even hitting the planet anymore but just the light that surrounds it.
3. I don't know what that is
4. Depends on your view on 1 but without aspect there is no orb so...
Posted by LuckyLibra979I think it's applying and separating.
As far as no 3. It means approaching or separating. All that means is the orbs are approaching exactness or a point where the distance is consider significant(like four orbs wide)or if its leaving the point of pressure.

Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
1. How small should an orb be?
2. Do large orbs not count in someone's chart or is it's effect not as strong?
3. Why do some orbs have letter A or S behind it? What does this mean?
Example: 9 degrees 15s/ -0 degrees 54a
4. What matters most the orb or the aspect itself?