"Another sign I'd mention is Leo. Now this is a sign that I trully believe is "misunderstood" and wrongly portrayed. It's as simple as that. Leos themselves hardly do it a lot of justice, since a good majority of them, when they discover astrology, start to put their behavioural patterns into wrong folders. Astrology can make you believe you are what you're not. It should be taken with a granule of salt."
hhmmm, in my case this was true in the beginning. when i first started learning about astrology (i was about 11 y/o), i definitely wanted to be that super-outgoing, attention-seeking drama queen. i have no idea why that appealed to me, but that phase didn't last long. it's a pain in the ass to have people always wanting to know your business. plus, now that i think about it, when i got into high school, i started spending a lot more time with aquas, capricorns, virgos, and other really laid-back leos. that made me appreciate the non-dramatic approach to life much more. 😛
oh yeah, i latched onto that cause i agree that leos tend to be misunderstood, but the sign i read most about besides my own is aquarius. partly because of my aqua moon, partly because i appreciate the aqua philosophy. but i have done quite a bit of reading on all of the signs.
Well it changes all the time... if I find that someone appeals to me (in any way), and I know their sign, then I might research that particular sign at that particular time.
But Leo is a Masculine sign yeah? yeh that's right if you people are bookish types its the people born in Feminine signs that are the most complex so you really have to have a uh bookish streak in you to get into it. Reading about Masculine signs by Masculine sign aligned people is less "tedious" > so to speak but when it comes to Feminine signs such as Capricorn the general astrological reading can become extremely tedious. and But Aquarius is the same way despite its opposition with Leo > Aquarius is just about as "out there" as Leo is separate platitudes but its oppositional in heterosexual experience, in the sense that Aquarius girls might avoid Leo girls but might eventually become attracted to Leo males and the other way around also! But both Aqaurius and Leo are dramatic signs > its inherent, I don't think that you should just curb your natures > Free nation just be yourself.
That is true Leo is a Fixed and stubborn Fire sign > and is egotistical but that's ok not a problem since you are an Aquarius woman you will appreciate these traits in a Leo man > except that since this is an opposition it has this repelling, attracting effect but its nice generally. I think that the Sagittarius sign is less likely to get along with leo than Aquarius. And Yes! its that Leo Fixed Fire vibration they could care less what anyone less what anyone else thinks > that is how powerful their vibration is they are mostly attractors, don't have to seek it as much as naturally getting it > Tera Patrick and Madonna, Mick Jagger that is pure Solar Vitality and charisma and sexuality, Uranus is charismatic on a separate platitude ofkorxk.
Well, I am a Sag/Cap cusp so I always read under these 2 signs.
Aside from those two - I am constantly reading for Tauruses and Scorpios too. I find Scorpios to be fascinating and I have some important Tauruses in my life.
Same as FE, Zan and DC .... I look up all interesting people I encounter.
Because I believe in LOA .. I use astrology backwards. If I spent a gross amount of time only researching/studying certain personality traits, then this is who I would bring to my world. So, I look up people AFTER encounters .. not studying before.
electroaqua, your views on leo/aquarius are very interesting. thinking about the aquas and leos i know, i would say that i agree with you, because i don't know any that actively seek the spotlight, yet they always seem to have attention drawn to them.