Posted by Skitty
I didn't know the reason pretty much all my planets were in the wrong houses was to due to me being born so far north.
This whole chart thang pleases my virgo rising! Everything is now placed where it should be :p ha
Really sweet!- thanx for the article @copperdove
Posted by tizianiPosted by Skitty
Well I used the default and listed a city in CA as my location and it was pretty much the same as my home n. So it doesn't look like a location thing.
If the whole houses system is inaccurate, does that mean if you have a Sag planet in a Scorpio house- it's Scorpio? Or a Taurus planet in a Gemini house- it is really Gemini- etc etc?
Like 90% of my planets are in the wrong house.
yeah pretty much.
but I thought you meant further North than Cali. CA is fine. There's just certain longitudes north and south of the equator that Placidus cannot cover. It's not that it's innacurate as a house system. It's just that literally it cannot cover every birth chart on the planet. Some people have to use whole signs. But really we're talking people born extremely far North or South. Near the polesclick to expand
Posted by CopperDove
Hi![]()
Hopefully my answers will be helpful, and others can fill in gaps.
1. There are different "systems" for analyzing birth data astrologically, and one of the most commonly used ones - Placidus - can result in more than one sign being in a house.
The effect is that the signs in that house express themselves in that house, no matter what degree they're in.
2. Yes, in some systems, like Placidus, a house can be bigger than others. I've tried to understand the technicalities, but it's confusing to me. I found this thread on another forum that might help: http://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum/showthread.php?t=15336
3. Depending on the system of analysis that is used, where placements go can change a bit, or a lot. Accurate birth time (down to the minute) and birth place and using a site that has good calculation software, like astro.com, can help narrow things down more accurately.
4. Yes, most astrologers say that degrees matter. Up to 10 for the luminaries (sun and moon) and up to 7 (or 8 sometimes) for the planets. For things like Part of Fortune, which most people don't use now, and even tighter orb is sometimes applied, up to 1-2 degrees.
Posted by tizianiPosted by Skitty
Well I used the default and listed a city in CA as my location and it was pretty much the same as my home n. So it doesn't look like a location thing.
If the whole houses system is inaccurate, does that mean if you have a Sag planet in a Scorpio house- it's Scorpio? Or a Taurus planet in a Gemini house- it is really Gemini- etc etc?
Like 90% of my planets are in the wrong house.
yeah pretty much.
but I thought you meant further North than Cali. CA is fine. There's just certain longitudes north and south of the equator that Placidus cannot cover. It's not that it's innacurate as a house system. It's just that literally it cannot cover every birth chart on the planet. Some people have to use whole signs. But really we're talking people born extremely far North or South. Near the polesclick to expand
Posted by astrogypsy7Posted by CopperDove
Hi![]()
Hopefully my answers will be helpful, and others can fill in gaps.
1. There are different "systems" for analyzing birth data astrologically, and one of the most commonly used ones - Placidus - can result in more than one sign being in a house.
The effect is that the signs in that house express themselves in that house, no matter what degree they're in.
2. Yes, in some systems, like Placidus, a house can be bigger than others. I've tried to understand the technicalities, but it's confusing to me. I found this thread on another forum that might help: http://www.astrologyweekly.com/forum/showthread.php?t=15336
3. Depending on the system of analysis that is used, where placements go can change a bit, or a lot. Accurate birth time (down to the minute) and birth place and using a site that has good calculation software, like astro.com, can help narrow things down more accurately.
4. Yes, most astrologers say that degrees matter. Up to 10 for the luminaries (sun and moon) and up to 7 (or 8 sometimes) for the planets. For things like Part of Fortune, which most people don't use now, and even tighter orb is sometimes applied, up to 1-2 degrees.
Thank you, this is news to me so I appreciate your reply.click to expand
Posted by tizianiPosted by astrogypsy7Posted by tizianiPosted by Skitty
Well I used the default and listed a city in CA as my location and it was pretty much the same as my home n. So it doesn't look like a location thing.
If the whole houses system is inaccurate, does that mean if you have a Sag planet in a Scorpio house- it's Scorpio? Or a Taurus planet in a Gemini house- it is really Gemini- etc etc?
Like 90% of my planets are in the wrong house.
yeah pretty much.
but I thought you meant further North than Cali. CA is fine. There's just certain longitudes north and south of the equator that Placidus cannot cover. It's not that it's innacurate as a house system. It's just that literally it cannot cover every birth chart on the planet. Some people have to use whole signs. But really we're talking people born extremely far North or South. Near the poles
OK.. I see what you are saying. I'm really not that far north though I don't think. I was born in Utah.
and then you moved to Texas?click to expand
Posted by astrogypsy7
Man... that double house thing is so confusing. So you're saying that whatever signs comprise a house that you will have an influence from both? Because what I find confusing is how a chart can say that someone has Aquarius in the 9th, and Capricorn in the 7th and 8th house yet their saturn is Aqaurius in the 8th house. (this is not my info) So its just like adding a dualistic quality to every house..? SO MUCH TO CONSIDER! I swear my brain wants to explode sometimes when I'm learning astrology, its satisfying yet overwhelming. All of you are so well versed, I envy you.
Posted by CopperDovePosted by astrogypsy7
Man... that double house thing is so confusing. So you're saying that whatever signs comprise a house that you will have an influence from both? Because what I find confusing is how a chart can say that someone has Aquarius in the 9th, and Capricorn in the 7th and 8th house yet their saturn is Aqaurius in the 8th house. (this is not my info) So its just like adding a dualistic quality to every house..? SO MUCH TO CONSIDER! I swear my brain wants to explode sometimes when I'm learning astrology, its satisfying yet overwhelming. All of you are so well versed, I envy you.
It can be confusing, but the way I see it is that any sign in a house is influenced by the number of the house. The way the signs divide up between the houses can vary, so some degrees of one sign will be in one house, and the rest will be in the house next to it. Charts online don't show degrees clearly, often, making it more confusing to figure out visually but when you can see the number of degrees it's easier to understand what's happening.
I have three signs that get into my 6th house, for example. It's the last degrees of Virgo, then all degrees of Libra, than the first half of Scorpio.
I think that my planets in my 6th house are all made to be Virgo-like, because of the 6th house. But note that I said Virgo-like, not Virgo, because only one of the planets is actually in Virgo, the rest are in Libra and Scorpio.click to expand
Posted by CopperDove
Yes, the 8th house influence is going to be strong for anything that is in the 8th house. The sign the planet is in counts too, but it will be acting in the realm of 8 house things.
Posted by astrogypsy7Posted by CopperDove
Yes, the 8th house influence is going to be strong for anything that is in the 8th house. The sign the planet is in counts too, but it will be acting in the realm of 8 house things.
So if the rulers of the signs are at odds with the rulers of the house, would you interpret that almost like how a planet can be in detriment in a sign, like Mars Libra?
I feel like that's so much to consider for even one house. Good lord. So you have to think about how Aquarius and scorpio deal with each other, how do saturn and aquarius deal, capricorn and scorpio and capricorn and aquarius too. Right?
Sorry I just have to clarify a lot so I make sure I understand correctly.click to expand
Posted by CopperDove
-- and I have Sag in my 7th house too, with two Sag planets, but they would likely be seen as not such a bad fit for the 7th house because the 7th house is traditionally ruled by Libra and Libra and Sag are sextile.
Posted by CopperDovePosted by astrogypsy7Posted by CopperDove
Yes, the 8th house influence is going to be strong for anything that is in the 8th house. The sign the planet is in counts too, but it will be acting in the realm of 8 house things.
So if the rulers of the signs are at odds with the rulers of the house, would you interpret that almost like how a planet can be in detriment in a sign, like Mars Libra?
I feel like that's so much to consider for even one house. Good lord. So you have to think about how Aquarius and scorpio deal with each other, how do saturn and aquarius deal, capricorn and scorpio and capricorn and aquarius too. Right?
Sorry I just have to clarify a lot so I make sure I understand correctly.
Yes, that can be the case. Some planets are believed to be not a good fit for certain houses. I have my sun in the 7th house, for example, and that isn't a good place for the sun (according to theory). It softens my Scorpio sun. I actually like it, and think it's positive for me (makes the energy less chaotic) but according to theory it isn't ideal.click to expand
Posted by lisabethur8
i do notice when i research alot of 7th house sun/venus are with libra dominants, or packed 7th housers too. So they all "get" eachother, in a way that they need to function equally for eachother.
Posted by lisabethur8Posted by CopperDovePosted by astrogypsy7Posted by CopperDove
Yes, the 8th house influence is going to be strong for anything that is in the 8th house. The sign the planet is in counts too, but it will be acting in the realm of 8 house things.
So if the rulers of the signs are at odds with the rulers of the house, would you interpret that almost like how a planet can be in detriment in a sign, like Mars Libra?
I feel like that's so much to consider for even one house. Good lord. So you have to think about how Aquarius and scorpio deal with each other, how do saturn and aquarius deal, capricorn and scorpio and capricorn and aquarius too. Right?
Sorry I just have to clarify a lot so I make sure I understand correctly.
Yes, that can be the case. Some planets are believed to be not a good fit for certain houses. I have my sun in the 7th house, for example, and that isn't a good place for the sun (according to theory). It softens my Scorpio sun. I actually like it, and think it's positive for me (makes the energy less chaotic) but according to theory it isn't ideal.
i wonder why some astrologers think that, (in theory) of 7th house suns, is it because libra sun is in the fall?? and if the sun sign of any of the 12, fall into the house of libra, it becomes fall too??
meaning, it is the same principle of 7th house/libra sun needing a partner to function Fully??? for the "other"??
click to expand
Posted by lisabethur8
i do notice when i research alot of 7th house sun/venus are with libra dominants, or packed 7th housers too. So they all "get" eachother, in a way that they need to function equally for eachother.
Posted by astrogypsy7Posted by CopperDove
-- and I have Sag in my 7th house too, with two Sag planets, but they would likely be seen as not such a bad fit for the 7th house because the 7th house is traditionally ruled by Libra and Libra and Sag are sextile.
I think I get it! But how do you synthesize having so many components...click to expand
Posted by CopperDovePosted by lisabethur8Posted by CopperDovePosted by astrogypsy7Posted by CopperDove
Yes, the 8th house influence is going to be strong for anything that is in the 8th house. The sign the planet is in counts too, but it will be acting in the realm of 8 house things.
So if the rulers of the signs are at odds with the rulers of the house, would you interpret that almost like how a planet can be in detriment in a sign, like Mars Libra?
I feel like that's so much to consider for even one house. Good lord. So you have to think about how Aquarius and scorpio deal with each other, how do saturn and aquarius deal, capricorn and scorpio and capricorn and aquarius too. Right?
Sorry I just have to clarify a lot so I make sure I understand correctly.
Yes, that can be the case. Some planets are believed to be not a good fit for certain houses. I have my sun in the 7th house, for example, and that isn't a good place for the sun (according to theory). It softens my Scorpio sun. I actually like it, and think it's positive for me (makes the energy less chaotic) but according to theory it isn't ideal.
i wonder why some astrologers think that, (in theory) of 7th house suns, is it because libra sun is in the fall?? and if the sun sign of any of the 12, fall into the house of libra, it becomes fall too??
meaning, it is the same principle of 7th house/libra sun needing a partner to function Fully??? for the "other"??
Yes, from what I understand, I think it's exactly as you described it.click to expand
Posted by astrogypsy7Posted by lisabethur8
i do notice when i research alot of 7th house sun/venus are with libra dominants, or packed 7th housers too. So they all "get" eachother, in a way that they need to function equally for eachother.
Are you wondering if any sun sign in the 7th is considered being fallen or if it's only the sun in libra in the 7th that is fallen? I cant appropriately answer you either way because I'm not sure but for the sake of understanding when someone does answer you I just wanted to get clarification on what you're asking.click to expand
Posted by Ands2016Posted by astrogypsy7Posted by lisabethur8
i do notice when i research alot of 7th house sun/venus are with libra dominants, or packed 7th housers too. So they all "get" eachother, in a way that they need to function equally for eachother.
Are you wondering if any sun sign in the 7th is considered being fallen or if it's only the sun in libra in the 7th that is fallen? I cant appropriately answer you either way because I'm not sure but for the sake of understanding when someone does answer you I just wanted to get clarification on what you're asking.
suns in the houses where the sun is in fall/debility are not great judges of character IMO.click to expand
Posted by Ands2016
i bet some jew bullied him when he was a kid and that's how the third reich started.
Posted by astrogypsy7
I need some clarification of my question #4... lol thank you in advance.
Posted by lisabethur8Posted by Ands2016
i bet some jew bullied him when he was a kid and that's how the third reich started.
lol
i'm gonna go with this and say....
nope. i bet it was because he had to go HUNGRY and for a taurus during the depression, it's enough to make him pissed off.
click to expand
Posted by CopperDovePosted by astrogypsy7
I need some clarification of my question #4... lol thank you in advance.
What would you like to know?click to expand
Posted by Ands2016Posted by CopperDove
I've had a pretty good track record in my life with determining a person's character, but I know another 7th house sun who has misjudged many times and been fooled by people in painful ways.
ima 7th house sun too.
we like people that like us IMO. that can't be a good judge. it lacks impartiality.click to expand
Posted by Ands2016Posted by astrogypsy7Posted by lisabethur8
i do notice when i research alot of 7th house sun/venus are with libra dominants, or packed 7th housers too. So they all "get" eachother, in a way that they need to function equally for eachother.
Are you wondering if any sun sign in the 7th is considered being fallen or if it's only the sun in libra in the 7th that is fallen? I cant appropriately answer you either way because I'm not sure but for the sake of understanding when someone does answer you I just wanted to get clarification on what you're asking.
suns in the houses where the sun is in fall/debility are not great judges of character IMO.click to expand
Posted by Ands2016Posted by CopperDove
I've had a pretty good track record in my life with determining a person's character, but I know another 7th house sun who has misjudged many times and been fooled by people in painful ways.
ima 7th house sun too.
we like people that like us IMO. that can't be a good judge. it lacks impartiality.click to expand
Posted by astrogypsy7Posted by CopperDovePosted by astrogypsy7
I need some clarification of my question #4... lol thank you in advance.
What would you like to know?
Do aspects always have to be within an exact degree? Like you can't just say, capricorn and Virgo are trine.. Right? It has to be the right degree away from each other?click to expand
Posted by Ands2016Posted by justagirlPosted by Ands2016Posted by astrogypsy7Posted by lisabethur8
i do notice when i research alot of 7th house sun/venus are with libra dominants, or packed 7th housers too. So they all "get" eachother, in a way that they need to function equally for eachother.
Are you wondering if any sun sign in the 7th is considered being fallen or if it's only the sun in libra in the 7th that is fallen? I cant appropriately answer you either way because I'm not sure but for the sake of understanding when someone does answer you I just wanted to get clarification on what you're asking.
suns in the houses where the sun is in fall/debility are not great judges of character IMO.
including Aqua? Sun is in detriment in Aqua...
Not sure i agree about being a bad judge of character, I do give many chances.
just houses. sun in 11th yeah. more obvious than 7th because the 7th houser might seem to be in a more harmonious environment or a support system of yes men.click to expand
Posted by Ands2016Posted by astrogypsy7Posted by Ands2016Posted by CopperDove
I've had a pretty good track record in my life with determining a person's character, but I know another 7th house sun who has misjudged many times and been fooled by people in painful ways.
ima 7th house sun too.
we like people that like us IMO. that can't be a good judge. it lacks impartiality.
You like people that like you or you like people who are like you?
both but virgo 11th house is the culprit of the latter.click to expand
Posted by CopperDovePosted by astrogypsy7Posted by CopperDovePosted by astrogypsy7
I need some clarification of my question #4... lol thank you in advance.
What would you like to know?
Do aspects always have to be within an exact degree? Like you can't just say, capricorn and Virgo are trine.. Right? It has to be the right degree away from each other?
No problem! I guess I didn't explain it well in my reply earlier.
Yes, they have to be exact degrees to be called an aspect, and for the energies to actually interact in a person, or in synastry (comparing two people).
There are different beliefs about how many degrees an aspect should be.
Many astrologers I've learnt from say 0-10 degrees is allowed if you're looking at a luminary (sun or moon) and comparing it to something else.
And 7-8 are often allowed for non-luminaries (the planets).
So, Capricorn and Virgo are only going to form an aspect if they are 0-10 degrees away from each other if one or both of them is a luminary. For example, Cap Sun and Virgo Moon, or Cap sun and Virgo Venus. Etc.
And they are only going to form an aspect if they are 0-7 or 8 degrees away from each other if they are planets. For example, Cap Venus and Virgo Mars.click to expand
Posted by Ands2016Posted by astrogypsy7Posted by Ands2016Posted by astrogypsy7Posted by Ands2016Posted by CopperDove
I've had a pretty good track record in my life with determining a person's character, but I know another 7th house sun who has misjudged many times and been fooled by people in painful ways.
ima 7th house sun too.
we like people that like us IMO. that can't be a good judge. it lacks impartiality.
You like people that like you or you like people who are like you?
both but virgo 11th house is the culprit of the latter.
Hm I have virgo in the 11th as well, no planets though. I do like when people like me...however I am just as quick to not maintain friends that do not have things in common with me.
same. that's a textbook reading from a website. i haven't had a lot of time to observe it myself. maybe 5 years from now you can tell me.click to expand
Posted by astrogypsy7Posted by CopperDovePosted by astrogypsy7Posted by CopperDovePosted by astrogypsy7
I need some clarification of my question #4... lol thank you in advance.
What would you like to know?
Do aspects always have to be within an exact degree? Like you can't just say, capricorn and Virgo are trine.. Right? It has to be the right degree away from each other?
No problem! I guess I didn't explain it well in my reply earlier.
Yes, they have to be exact degrees to be called an aspect, and for the energies to actually interact in a person, or in synastry (comparing two people).
There are different beliefs about how many degrees an aspect should be.
Many astrologers I've learnt from say 0-10 degrees is allowed if you're looking at a luminary (sun or moon) and comparing it to something else.
And 7-8 are often allowed for non-luminaries (the planets).
So, Capricorn and Virgo are only going to form an aspect if they are 0-10 degrees away from each other if one or both of them is a luminary. For example, Cap Sun and Virgo Moon, or Cap sun and Virgo Venus. Etc.
And they are only going to form an aspect if they are 0-7 or 8 degrees away from each other if they are planets. For example, Cap Venus and Virgo Mars.
When you say "Luminary" are you literally meaning the planets that give off light we can see? At first you said (sun,moon) but then you mentioned venus too.
Other than that, I totally get what you're saying. Thanks for clarifying, that is super helpful!click to expand
Posted by tizianiPosted by Skitty
Well I used the default and listed a city in CA as my location and it was pretty much the same as my home n. So it doesn't look like a location thing.
If the whole houses system is inaccurate, does that mean if you have a Sag planet in a Scorpio house- it's Scorpio? Or a Taurus planet in a Gemini house- it is really Gemini- etc etc?
Like 90% of my planets are in the wrong house.
yeah pretty much.
but I thought you meant further North than Cali. CA is fine. There's just certain longitudes north and south of the equator that Placidus cannot cover. It's not that it's innacurate as a house system. It's just that literally it cannot cover every birth chart on the planet. Some people have to use whole signs. But really we're talking people born extremely far North or South. Near the polesclick to expand
Posted by tizianiPosted by HappyCapperPosted by tizianiPosted by Skitty
Well I used the default and listed a city in CA as my location and it was pretty much the same as my home n. So it doesn't look like a location thing.
If the whole houses system is inaccurate, does that mean if you have a Sag planet in a Scorpio house- it's Scorpio? Or a Taurus planet in a Gemini house- it is really Gemini- etc etc?
Like 90% of my planets are in the wrong house.
yeah pretty much.
but I thought you meant further North than Cali. CA is fine. There's just certain longitudes north and south of the equator that Placidus cannot cover. It's not that it's innacurate as a house system. It's just that literally it cannot cover every birth chart on the planet. Some people have to use whole signs. But really we're talking people born extremely far North or South. Near the poles
Are you talking about Gauquelin charts when you say that a taurus planet(for instance) in a gemini house makes it gemini?
No, I was just agreeing in general to the idea when it comes to whole signs but not agreeing word for word.
I know only about the Gauquelins' stats on cadent houses and careers but I don't know anything about Gauquelin charts.click to expand
Posted by tizianiPosted by HappyCapperPosted by tizianiPosted by Skitty
Well I used the default and listed a city in CA as my location and it was pretty much the same as my home n. So it doesn't look like a location thing.
If the whole houses system is inaccurate, does that mean if you have a Sag planet in a Scorpio house- it's Scorpio? Or a Taurus planet in a Gemini house- it is really Gemini- etc etc?
Like 90% of my planets are in the wrong house.
yeah pretty much.
but I thought you meant further North than Cali. CA is fine. There's just certain longitudes north and south of the equator that Placidus cannot cover. It's not that it's innacurate as a house system. It's just that literally it cannot cover every birth chart on the planet. Some people have to use whole signs. But really we're talking people born extremely far North or South. Near the poles
Are you talking about Gauquelin charts when you say that a taurus planet(for instance) in a gemini house makes it gemini?
No, I was just agreeing in general to the idea when it comes to whole signs but not agreeing word for word.
I know only about the Gauquelins' stats on cadent houses and careers but I don't know anything about Gauquelin charts.click to expand
We'd love to hear your thoughts! If you're not logged in, you can still share your feedback below. Your input helps us improve the experience for everyone. To post your own content or join the conversation, please log in or create an account.