Signed Up:
Feb 22, 2006Comments: 0 · Posts: 2787 · Topics: 83
According to that, I'm a Pisces. BOO!!!! Lol jk.
Signed Up:
Nov 08, 2006Comments: 37 · Posts: 4746 · Topics: 283
Hey what up! ..tall dark and pisces ..j/k/2 ..=) ..'does have a certain ring to it.
Signed Up:
Mar 04, 2007Comments: 0 · Posts: 1775 · Topics: 125
That discovery almost made me lost faith in astrology, almost all the aries become pisces wtf? But then, you realized the days divided between each of the signs is pretty uneven. like Leo has 36 days, while "Ophiuchus" only has 17 days. Should it be fair that more people are born as Leos per year than Ophiuchus then?
Signed Up:
Mar 04, 2007Comments: 0 · Posts: 1775 · Topics: 125
But then in sidreal, I am still an aries, so Ha!
Signed Up:
Jul 18, 2007Comments: 0 · Posts: 815 · Topics: 61
This would make my sister a December 16 Ophiuchus. I will take a closer look at this.
Signed Up:
Jul 18, 2007Comments: 0 · Posts: 815 · Topics: 61
In the Sidreal I'm still a Gemini June 17.
Signed Up:
Jul 18, 2007Comments: 0 · Posts: 815 · Topics: 61
That link would make my very Taurus mother an Aries and she's quintessentially Taurean and I become a June 17 Taurus so that link seems dubious to me.
Signed Up:
Jul 18, 2007Comments: 0 · Posts: 815 · Topics: 61
Oh no no no thanks to my absent mindedness my mom is a May 17 Taurus.
Signed Up:
Nov 08, 2006Comments: 37 · Posts: 4746 · Topics: 283
yeah same here, personally i don't put 'any' stock into it (the website); unless the actual characteristics stay 'the same', regardless of sign change. i don't even think i put much stock into sidereal astrology. (which would make me aquarius..lol) For many obvious reasons and imho, 'Western Astrology ..will always be the accepted/most accurate, and obviously makes the most sense.
(my mother's the quintessential Aries/my Dad very Piscean, as i am..)
Signed Up:
May 23, 2006Comments: 0 · Posts: 2604 · Topics: 117
it could have been a mere coincidence that 12 constellations matched the 12 signs 5000 or whatever years ago. may be when those days astrologers kept wondering about the dates, they probably happened to find out the similarities in sun in each constellation. and the shape of the constellation and the meaning man has assumed to it are only man's assumption and imagination based on the available 2D perspective from earth.
Signed Up:
Nov 08, 2006Comments: 37 · Posts: 4746 · Topics: 283
"but just because there is a thirdteenth sign, it doesn't mean that the new system can be used as a new standard for astrology. Because like I say before, the division of time periods between the signs is simply unfair."
I very much agree with you there, red_aries. I don't believe in Orphicus or any 13th sign. As in my last post, just by personality traits alone/how people 'really' feel and act; i will always find 'Western Astrology' far more credible for those reasons, and of course many others - as you delve even deeper into the houses/aspects/synastry, etc etc.
As for sidereal. Again, the 'real' proof; how do people really feel & act. For some, the sun-sign wouldn't change. But for many others, it may. I think an Aries will always be an Aries, a Pisces a Pisces, a Leo a Leo ..and so on and so on.
I really haven't, as yet heard 'any' personality descriptions given for the sidereal sign dates or any of the other 'constellation' theories. With new dates, should be new information. A Gemini can't suddenly turn into a Cancer. A Pisces into an Aquarius. It just doesn't make sense to me. The traditional 'tried & true' (Western Astrology) is by far the most credible, & proven; because people by the billions are actually living it everyday..
But anyway, it's all still an interesting read! =)
Signed Up:
Jul 18, 2007Comments: 0 · Posts: 815 · Topics: 61
I took a second look at the link and the associated mythology - this constellation must be real and in this line a comparatively complex one although the constellation Ophiuchus must be genuine. Considering the mythology vague Scorpio/Sagittarius undertones - Scorpio animals being the spider, snake and the "serpent" these Scorpionic creatures. Chrion is associated with Sagittarius and in that brief mythological summary Ophiuchus is associated as a rescuer which could be characteristically Sagittarian an association with Sagittarius as a 'rescuer' sign. Chiron - Centaur - well Sagittarians are basically Centaurians but considering the duality of this sign we have Archers also - half human/half horse.
Signed Up:
Jul 11, 2006Comments: 0 · Posts: 3318 · Topics: 123
I'm a LEO!!!!!!!?????? wait.....why?
*VE sits in the corner and broods venomously over this with a cookie at story time as the other dxp clubhouse kids listen to lies AND LIKE IT!!!!! HOW'S THAT FOR A SPANK!! LOL......*
mwhahahahahahahaha......I suck as a villain, I can't take it seriously....
Signed Up:
Oct 11, 2006Comments: 2454 · Posts: 30581 · Topics: 372
Someone once told me that astrology was nothing more than a bunch of very generalized statements that really anyone could fit the description of.
But Idk, I see it. The similarities in people of the same sign are striking at times...more than a conincidence.
The universe is about patterns after all.
But obviously, ultimately, your environment molds you into who you are.
Signed Up:
Oct 11, 2006Comments: 2454 · Posts: 30581 · Topics: 372
I would technically be the Ophiuchus or whatever.
I guess that would just mean a blend of Sag and Scorpio traits?
I could see that, actually. (But I do have Scorp rising)
Signed Up:
Apr 20, 2009Comments: 0 · Posts: 209 · Topics: 12
I'd be a Ophiuchus... December 13th
Signed Up:
Jan 07, 2009Comments: 305 · Posts: 14219 · Topics: 239
me?
09: Scorpius the Scorpion 23 Nov to 29 Nov