PISCES = BOSS OF ALL BOSSES PT.2

a few years ago i made a list of how a lot of CEO's tend to be pisces, and now i just read this article that shows that people born in march are indeed the most likely to be CEO's

http://business.time.com/2012/10/26/best-and-worst-months-to-be-born-if-you-want-to-be-the-boss/<BR>
The top 5 CEO-producing months are: March (12.53% ), April (10.67% ), November (10.67% ), January (10.13% ), October (9.87% ).

and here's another interesting bit from the article:

although 8.16% of U.S. births happen in June, only 6.13% of CEOs were born in that month, while a mere 5.87% of CEOs were born in July, despite 8.75% of the U.S. population being born that month.

hmm,looks like gemini's & cancers aren't meant to be bosses

Posted by Mr. Defense
Considering how poorly some companies are ran, that doesn't surprise me.

Posted by geminicandle
And I had a Cancer boss, he was a mean and moody little fuck. When he was good, he was like a best mother one can imagine. BUT! When he was mean? He was like the meanest, bitchiest stepmother one can imagine.

He recently asked me, passively-aggressively, to work for him again (through a third party), after he has done some very vicious things to me. I am contemplating between telling him "fuck you" or to accept, just so I can laugh at his face, lol.

lol

i know two gemini women that are indeed bossy..idk how well they'd do in the corporate world,but they're good at getting people to do things for them..except me..one of'em(my gf sister) ALWAYS says to me "i could never be in a relationship with you because you're too damn stubborn" lol..*shrugs*

Posted by seraph
But did you look at what the data is based on, as in *why* Pisces allegedly make great CEOs? It actually has nothing to do with being a Pisces or any other sign at all, and, according to the study, everything to do with more academic opportunity and upward-mobility based on academic cut-off dates. This has nothing to do with astrology.

true the study wasn't based on astrology necessarily, but it doesn't negate what im saying because they still needed & used people birth dates for their results

Posted by DonJohnson
LMAO

Who cares about who becomes CEO. most companies go bankrupt in the US.

The best barometer of success is MONEY. How much money you actually make.


Cancer, Leo, Scoprio, Taurus are the top earners.


Neither pisces or aries are on the top earners list.

Silly child.

LOL some CEO's get paid more then the president..

I don't know how pisces fare as CEOs usually, but one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our time was indeed a pisces.
Steve Jobs made Apple an incredible success story. Twice.
Always ahead of his time, he created the first personal computer with wozniak and launched the personal computer era, then was booted out of his own company by greedy managers who ran apple into the ground, while exiled he founded Pixar, then he took back Apple, made it financially viable, and launched the smartphone era, making his company the richest american tech companies.

That said, pisces generally need something to inspire them and I suppose they're not made for boring day to day management unless there is a higher goal.
In the case of stev Jobs above, you can see that he was guided by his visions for the future, and not by monetary reward.

Posted by geminicandle

Posted by DAMEN VI

Posted by DonJohnson
LMAO

Who cares about who becomes CEO. most companies go bankrupt in the US.

The best barometer of success is MONEY. How much money you actually make.


Cancer, Leo, Scoprio, Taurus are the top earners.


Neither pisces or aries are on the top earners list.

Silly child.

LOL some CEO's get paid more then the president..

So do drug dealers and some other criminals. He does have the point.

click to expand

what point? what he said didn't have nothing to do with being a boss of a company, which is the point of this thread..cancers has the lowest % of being a boss so thats why he wants to switch the topic up,LMAO

cancers are the mothers of the zodiac..they're good when your down in the dumps and need a tit to suck on, but if you're standing on your own two then a cancer feels inadequate and becomes a pathetic cling on, or a psycho

Posted by geminicandle

Posted by DAMEN VI

Posted by DonJohnson
LMAO

Who cares about who becomes CEO. most companies go bankrupt in the US.

The best barometer of success is MONEY. How much money you actually make.


Cancer, Leo, Scoprio, Taurus are the top earners.


Neither pisces or aries are on the top earners list.

Silly child.

LOL some CEO's get paid more then the president..

So do drug dealers and some other criminals. He does have the point.

click to expand

Drug dealers and criminals are entrepreneurs too

yeah, so I get it, according to you, even the brightest minds are not good unless they're Cancer or sthg. And I've seen you can claim some personalities as cancer because they had their rising or moon or whatever planet in cancer (well, that's what I get from your threads). Self-service astrology as I call it.
Now that I think of it it is indeed a cancer that finally managed to strike Jobs down, cancers' greatest achievements.

Posted by DonJohnson



some CEO's had their homes and cars seized by creditors.


check this out. simple math. I know you failed out of high school so it's hard for you to understand.

So let's just say march babies are more likelyto be CEO's by 2 more % points than a July baby.
For every Steve Jobs, you'll need 10,000 dead beat drug addicts to balance out the fact that you still can't make it into the top earners bracket. You get it? Think for a second. Do the math. It just means your sign has that many more losers to drag the CEO's behind. Not to mention the failed CEO's lol. You can start a company tomorrow for sucking dong for baking soda. That doesn't mean you're a boss.

Do you get it? Statistically, your sign still LOSE.

The top earners are not born in Feb or March. Give up your pipe dream

and some earners LOSE all their money..like bernie madoff..so whats the point in even sayin the bolded?

and being a CEO isnt just about starting a company, you moron, its about strategy,managing and making major corporate decisions that could affect either a few,a 100, or thousands of people's lives..cancers aren't built for that..ya'll don't have the heart..and being a top earner could mean you invented dildo's or blow up dolls..good for you *shrugs*

Posted by DonJohnson


What he created is an addiction for your mind. a device which takes away all of your original thoughts at the remaining time of your life. Any time you might think through some personal issues be it at a bus stop, on a train, lunch break, etc.... are now spent fiddling 1 of a million app on your phone.

He created a device which takes away more of your brain capacity with no redeeming values.

Yet we are having this conversation, either from a personal computer, or from a smartphone.

Posted by DonJohnson



the % of earners that lose their money is a lot less likely than a business going bankrupt 60-70% . They can not be discussed as a parallel. Certainly not to mutually exclude one another.

You have the brain capacity of an aborted fetus.

How old are you?

this study wasn't based off of a bunch of mom & pop stores, they gathered their list from S&P 500 companies..the best of the best..and just simply saying "top earners" is too vague to compare with a specific title like CEO..so your right, this shouldn't be discussed

Like Virgos, I do think Pisces are underrated. Anytime Ive ever looked at a top earner list Id see a number of Pisces on there.

Posted by DonJohnson
Careerbuilder survey.

http://www.divinecaroline.com/self/horoscopes/best-career-your-zodiac-sign

This is where you got your stats from?? A survey of 9000 people? mannnnn..

Posted by seraph

Uh, yeah. They had to use birth dates. But you aren't looking at what's behind that.

The connection between those birth dates and the fact that some of them happen to be for Pisces is incidental. There is no posited relationship between those birth dates and Piscean traits (which you're playing up by implication.) It isn't because Pisces are more clever or capable, it's because (so the researchers claim) that people born on those dates had more upward mobility and opportunity based on their ages when entering into academic institutions, *because* those dates happened to co-incide with the ability to start studies at a certain point, relative to other children's opportunity to do the same. It's completely by chance.

So the entire premise of your thread is fallacious.

just say what you really wanna say, which is: since it isn't a so-called piscean "trait" to be a CEO, then its just incidental(which is hogwash too btw)...because being left behind 1 year AS A CHILD, IN GRADE SCHOOL, should never be a deciding/determining factor as to whether on not a person would become a CEO,which most likely wouldn't happen until a person is well off into there mid 20's - early 30's anyway..its almost laughable

if i said taurus was most likely to be CEO,most of you here wouldn't have even debated it...it just goes to show that you can't base everything you read about astrology traits as fact also

Posted by lnana04

Posted by DonJohnson
Careerbuilder survey.

http://www.divinecaroline.com/self/horoscopes/best-career-your-zodiac-sign

This is where you got your stats from?? A survey of 9000 people? mannnnn..

click to expand

on top of that, its off of "divine caroline" LOL..dude is a certified fruitcake

Posted by seraph


But it actually *is* incidental. it has nothing to do with Pisces *being* a Pisces.

But that is exactly what the study is saying. So you posted a study that you fundamentally disagree with, and given that, you the want to re-spin it so it actually has something to do with Astrology when it really doesn't.

That would depend on what the purpose of the study is and how you're (mis)interpreting it.

how isn't it *being* a pisces when its good chance that at least 70% of the 12% of CEO's born in march are likely to be a pisces?its like you're basically saying that they're not being themselves,lol..i didn't post this to discuss traits anyway, im just adding more facts to my original thread where i stated that a lot of CEO's are pisces..and based off the percentages given in the article(which was the main reason why i used it),it only further proved my point..

Posted by seraph


"where i stated that a lot of CEO's are pisces"

Which in the context of the study means absolutely nothing astrologically. Move the cutoff dates anywhere else, and you could say the same about every other sign, and neither would be any more significant than the other.

Yes, a lot of CEOs are Pisces. Ok. Which means what? According to the study, nothing. In which case, there's really no point to associating anything astrological with the study results because it wouldn't mean anything.

which means that i provided more evidence for my original thread,hence the title "pisces = boss of all bosses pt.2"

and lets talk about the cut off date..what actually makes that specific date so beneficial to someone born in march?? meaning, since the top 5 months was march,april,november,january & october, why was march #1?

my theory is that when pisces is focused on something, we excel greatly at it(from business to boxing), the problem for some i believe is finding that something to focus on & sticking with it..

Posted by SUT2pointoh

Posted by Mr. Defense
Considering how poorly some companies are ran, that doesn't surprise me.

word

I can never see a pisces running a company. too susceptible to pipedreaming

click to expand

like the CEO of biggest bank in america?(jpmorgan)

jamie Dimon was named to Time magazine's 2006, 2008, 2009, and 2011 lists of the world's 100 most influential people. He was also named to Institutional Investor's Best CEOs list in the All-America Executive Team Survey from 2008 through 2011.He was named the CEO of the Year in 2011

Posted by Redbull
I mean Pisces aint stupid or nothing. I base everything off real life experience. And they seem to know things the rest of us may not. A pisces boss isnt hard to see. They obviously exist. May be more of a patient approach than do first think second approach. And in the long term...certain traits are more advantageous. I wont rain on the parade.

its funny because i knew making this thread was gonna instantly cause a negative reaction,its funny thou..but it just goes to show how much astrology stereotypes has certain people brain washed..i too only base my opinions on real life experience