
Dazed
@_Dazed
6 Years10,000+ Posts
Comments: 9549 · Posts: 12626 · Topics: 250





Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
Wouldn't bother to waste my time.
However, I understand that an associate of Lin Wood is putting together a defense team for Rittenhouse.
In case you forgot, Lin Wood was the attorney for Richard Jewell in the Atlanta Olympics bombing.
He also is the attorney for Nicholas Sandman, the kid in the Covington defamation case, in which CNN and the Washington Post have settled for undisclosed amounts.
I know that probably doesn't mean much to you, but there it is.
By all means, please carry on.

Posted by _DazedPosted by CancerOnTheCusp
Wouldn't bother to waste my time.
However, I understand that an associate of Lin Wood is putting together a defense team for Rittenhouse.
In case you forgot, Lin Wood was the attorney for Richard Jewell in the Atlanta Olympics bombing.
He also is the attorney for Nicholas Sandman, the kid in the Covington defamation case, in which CNN and the Washington Post have settled for undisclosed amounts.
I know that probably doesn't mean much to you, but there it is.
By all means, please carry on.
So you agree with the OP?click to expand

Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by _DazedPosted by CancerOnTheCusp
Wouldn't bother to waste my time.
However, I understand that an associate of Lin Wood is putting together a defense team for Rittenhouse.
In case you forgot, Lin Wood was the attorney for Richard Jewell in the Atlanta Olympics bombing.
He also is the attorney for Nicholas Sandman, the kid in the Covington defamation case, in which CNN and the Washington Post have settled for undisclosed amounts.
I know that probably doesn't mean much to you, but there it is.
By all means, please carry on.
So you agree with the OP?
Go play that game with somebody else.
In case you didn't understand, things would indicate that politicians, prosecutors, public figures, and media seeking to twist this issue best tread lightly.click to expand





Posted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.

Posted by _DazedPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
Since when has burning down towns, beating/murdering store owners in the streets, obstructing traffic, pulling people out of their car and beating/murdering them in the street.. ever been legal?click to expand

Posted by SoulPosted by _DazedPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
Since when has burning down towns, beating/murdering store owners in the streets, obstructing traffic, pulling people out of their car and beating/murdering them in the street.. ever been legal?
Since the day cops started beating and shooting people into a bloody pulp for being in the streets apparently.click to expand

Posted by Sith_Rogen
Had he shot someone actively engaged in criminal activity that threatened the lives of others, maybe there's a case.


Posted by _DazedPosted by SoulPosted by _DazedPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
Since when has burning down towns, beating/murdering store owners in the streets, obstructing traffic, pulling people out of their car and beating/murdering them in the street.. ever been legal?
Since the day cops started beating and shooting people into a bloody pulp for being in the streets apparently.
The answer you're looking for is.. "Never."
Try making a different point.click to expand

Posted by Sith_RogenPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
What you're asserting might have merit if:
1) the constitution didn't grant freedom of assembly
2) the people who were murdered had committed crimes
Spraying bullets indiscriminately into a crowd of people exercising an enumerated constitutional right is murder.click to expand

Posted by SoulPosted by Sith_RogenPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
What you're asserting might have merit if:
1) the constitution didn't grant freedom of assembly
2) the people who were murdered had committed crimes
Spraying bullets indiscriminately into a crowd of people exercising an enumerated constitutional right is murder.
Talking about the constitution to Americans in 2020 is like trying to convince everyone to wear a mask. Might as well throw that shitty document out the window at this point. This is what I try to explain to people in my area who support Trump (which I know you don't) These people don't understand that an authoritarian government doesn't want people to have the right to assemble, or speak opinions. Guns are honestly next. They want full order and obedience.click to expand

Posted by Sith_RogenPosted by SoulPosted by Sith_RogenPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
What you're asserting might have merit if:
1) the constitution didn't grant freedom of assembly
2) the people who were murdered had committed crimes
Spraying bullets indiscriminately into a crowd of people exercising an enumerated constitutional right is murder.
Talking about the constitution to Americans in 2020 is like trying to convince everyone to wear a mask. Might as well throw that shitty document out the window at this point. This is what I try to explain to people in my area who support Trump (which I know you don't) These people don't understand that an authoritarian government doesn't want people to have the right to assemble, or speak opinions. Guns are honestly next. They want full order and obedience.
An armed mob of white guys busted a door down at the ID state capitol this week. If a black guy showed up and started shooting at them, would he be justified?
They ignored police orders and damaged property...click to expand

Posted by _DazedPosted by SoulPosted by Sith_RogenPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
What you're asserting might have merit if:
1) the constitution didn't grant freedom of assembly
2) the people who were murdered had committed crimes
Spraying bullets indiscriminately into a crowd of people exercising an enumerated constitutional right is murder.
Talking about the constitution to Americans in 2020 is like trying to convince everyone to wear a mask. Might as well throw that shitty document out the window at this point. This is what I try to explain to people in my area who support Trump (which I know you don't) These people don't understand that an authoritarian government doesn't want people to have the right to assemble, or speak opinions. Guns are honestly next. They want full order and obedience.
Are you willing to stand up for you Constitutional rights? Just curious.click to expand

Posted by Wildd_FloPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
You remind me of my drunk biology teacher from high school.click to expand

Posted by Wildd_FloPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
You remind me of my drunk biology teacher from high school.click to expand

Posted by brianafayPosted by Wildd_FloPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
You remind me of my drunk biology teacher from high school.
He said “this next part is even better, I’m kind of excited” 😂click to expand

Posted by SoulPosted by brianafayPosted by Wildd_FloPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
You remind me of my drunk biology teacher from high school.
He said “this next part is even better, I’m kind of excited” 😂
Sometimes I get excited when I'm about to say something thats going to piss people off. Its a pretty negative trait, but hard to resist. One second you think I can't go any lower meanwhile I'm thinking "But wait, there's more!"
My only point in any of that is from my perspective almost all people from every side of the spectrum worship some pretty shitty people in one way or another.
Did you know many people on the right consider this kid a true hero? There will be much more of this in the near future I bet.click to expand

Posted by SoulPosted by _DazedPosted by SoulPosted by Sith_RogenPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
What you're asserting might have merit if:
1) the constitution didn't grant freedom of assembly
2) the people who were murdered had committed crimes
Spraying bullets indiscriminately into a crowd of people exercising an enumerated constitutional right is murder.
Talking about the constitution to Americans in 2020 is like trying to convince everyone to wear a mask. Might as well throw that shitty document out the window at this point. This is what I try to explain to people in my area who support Trump (which I know you don't) These people don't understand that an authoritarian government doesn't want people to have the right to assemble, or speak opinions. Guns are honestly next. They want full order and obedience.
Are you willing to stand up for you Constitutional rights? Just curious.
Nope. They've got me sold to China at this point. I've even been eating every meal with chopsticks. Anyway I really enjoy my trade job, and make good money. Once they take that right away from me though then I will be willing to fight for rights, because I'll have nothing left to do or feel good about. So I understand the deep rooted needs for people to protests. Some go for equal rights, some go to stop an abusive police system that masks our governments motives, and many go because covid made them jobless. That or other protesters burned down their business and made them jobless.click to expand

Posted by _DazedPosted by SoulPosted by _DazedPosted by SoulPosted by Sith_RogenPosted by Soul
If people are allowed to burn down their town and beat/ murder store owners in the streets, and also obstruct traffic and pull people out of their car and beat/ murder them in the street because it supports their "movement" then this kid is allowed to do the same because it supports his "movement "
This next part is even better. Im kind of excited. Assuming there was no murder involved, you have to admit that if its wrong to murder a criminal in the street, then its wrong to murder a known nazi or racist in the street just as well. I can feel people squirming at the core.
Try to even fight or argue with that, because if anyone does you will be 100% proven a hypocrite.
It's either law and order, or a complete free for all. Pick one.
What you're asserting might have merit if:
1) the constitution didn't grant freedom of assembly
2) the people who were murdered had committed crimes
Spraying bullets indiscriminately into a crowd of people exercising an enumerated constitutional right is murder.
Talking about the constitution to Americans in 2020 is like trying to convince everyone to wear a mask. Might as well throw that shitty document out the window at this point. This is what I try to explain to people in my area who support Trump (which I know you don't) These people don't understand that an authoritarian government doesn't want people to have the right to assemble, or speak opinions. Guns are honestly next. They want full order and obedience.
Are you willing to stand up for you Constitutional rights? Just curious.
Nope. They've got me sold to China at this point. I've even been eating every meal with chopsticks. Anyway I really enjoy my trade job, and make good money. Once they take that right away from me though then I will be willing to fight for rights, because I'll have nothing left to do or feel good about. So I understand the deep rooted needs for people to protests. Some go for equal rights, some go to stop an abusive police system that masks our governments motives, and many go because covid made them jobless. That or other protesters burned down their business and made them jobless.
So say they take your right to work away and make good money.. by either killing you or incarcerating you.
How do you fight for your rights?click to expand




Posted by Amandus
Regardless of how wrong the kid was for being there I think he's a hero. There is one less pedophile and one less abuser in this world because of him.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →