
-_-
@LePewp
8 Years1,000+ Posts
Comments: 525 · Posts: 1201 · Topics: 14


Posted by Impulsv
The irony how they state the Bible to back up unproposed laws yet don’t want to follow current laws in place

Posted by ellesbelles
This administration is going to get so much worse.

Posted by MademoiselleFisk
They're just praying for RBG to keel over and die so they can get another conservative judge in there.


Posted by Ram416
I am just curious as to why Saudi Arabia and Egypt are not on the travel ban list.
Weren't the terrorists responsible for the 9/11 bombings from those two countries? Or is that piece of information irrelevant in this case?

Posted by hydorahPosted by Ram416are you fakely curious or you really don't follow what's going on in the world?
I am just curious as to why Saudi Arabia and Egypt are not on the travel ban list.
Weren't the terrorists responsible for the 9/11 bombings from those two countries? Or is that piece of information irrelevant in this case?
which side would you rather support? lolclick to expand

Posted by ellesbellesPosted by Ram416
I am just curious as to why Saudi Arabia and Egypt are not on the travel ban list.
Weren't the terrorists responsible for the 9/11 bombings from those two countries? Or is that piece of information irrelevant in this case?
click to expand

Posted by Ram416Posted by hydorahPosted by Ram416
I am just curious as to why Saudi Arabia and Egypt are not on the travel ban list.
Weren't the terrorists responsible for the 9/11 bombings from those two countries? Or is that piece of information irrelevant in this case?
are you fakely curious or you really don't follow what's going on in the world?
which side would you rather support? lol
Fakely curious.
Also, I live in the country that sponsored the Trump-Kim summit, so what do you think?click to expand

Posted by Ram416
I am just curious as to why Saudi Arabia and Egypt are not on the travel ban list.
Weren't the terrorists responsible for the 9/11 bombings from those two countries? Or is that piece of information irrelevant in this case?

Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
[blockquote]The Supreme Court has upheld President Trump's travel ban Tuesday. With a 5-4 vote, the court wrote in its opinion that the order is "squarely within the scope of Presidential authority."
The 5-4 decision Tuesday is the court's first substantive ruling on a Trump administration policy. The president reacted to news of the ruling, tweeting "Wow!"[/quote]
[blockquote]The court may have signaled its eventual approval in December, when the justices allowed the policy to take full effect even as the court fight continued and lower courts had ruled it out of bounds.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a dissent that based on the evidence in the case "a reasonable observer would conclude that the Proclamation was motivated by anti-Muslim animus." She said her colleagues arrived at the opposite result by "ignoring the facts, misconstruing our legal precedent, and turning a blind eye to the pain and suffering the Proclamation inflicts upon countless families and individuals, many of whom are United States citizens."
Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan also dissented.
In a tweet from the ACLU, the advocacy group said "this is not the first time the Court has been wrong, or has allowed official racism and xenophobia to continue rather than standing up to it."[/blockquote]
Meanwhile a white guy in middle america is about to buy another assault rifle so he can play russian roulette with the american people.
"Democracy" "MAGA" "A Safer America"
Let's destabilize other countries then deny the refugees we create because of their religion, FOH