
LetltB
@LetltB
12 Years5,000+ Posts
Comments: 1 · Posts: 9186 · Topics: 179




Posted by xdimplez
one advantage would be that, at least the people who seek it are doing something about unprotected sex, and not having it lead to unwanted pregnancies that can open up a can of worms [i.e young parents, neglect, possible abuse, psychological issues] BUT i still think it should require at least a doctors visit to get a prescription for it



Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
A federal judge ruled Friday that the morning-after pill, known by its brand name of Plan B, should be available without a prescription or any age or point-of-sale restrictions within 30 days. The ruling is in opposition to a previous decision by the Obama administration.
Judge Edward R. Korman of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled in Tummino v. Hamburg, reversing a prior decision by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health and Human Services (HHS).
Plan B (Levonorgestrel) is an emergency contraception to be taken within 72 hours after unprotected intercourse to prevent pregnancy. In 1999, it became the first emergency contraceptive approved for use by prescription. In 2006, the FDA approved it as an over-the-counter drug for women over the age of 18, while requiring a prescription for minors. The FDA subsequently allowed 17-year-olds to obtain the drug without a prescription.
In 2011, the administration backed an HHS decision, overruling the FDA, to not allow women under the age of 17 to obtain emergency contraceptives without a prescription
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/05/morning-after-pill_n_3019579.html?flv=1