Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Haha, there is still hope somewhere in YU-ES-EH?
Check this article please
VT Cong Candidate Calls For Arrest of Bush and Cheney by U.S. Military
West pawlet, VT 9/20/06
(802) 645-9727
Former Army Lieutenant and a candidate for Congress in VT, Dennis Morrisseau of W. Pawlet, today called for the arrest of President Bush and Vice President Cheney by the American military "if necessary" to prevent an unauthorized attack upon the nation of Iran.
"American forces are apparently already active inside Iran, and Naval forces have received orders to deploy to that country," Morrisseau said. "The President has NO AUTHORITY to attack the nation of Iran whatsoever, in the absence of a full, formal Declaration of War on Iran by the sitting Congress," Morrisseau said. He said any order for an attack upon Iran or to deploy naval forces to its coastal waters is illegal, and called upon officers of the American military to "First, refuse to obey such an order. If the president persists and insists on ordering our forces into combat in or over Iran without a formal Declaration of War, then I call upon you, General Pace, as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and upon such other military officers as clearly see their duty in these circumstances to detain both the President and Vice President, until such time as the Congress shall act."
Morrisseau, a Congressional candidate who was court-martialled for opposition to the Vietnam War in 1968, said he has written to General Pace to ask for the intervention of the military. "In spite of my opposition to the Vietnam War and the court-martial which we ultimately defeated, I was a good soldier who had the respect of my superior officers throughout the ordeal. And they had mine!" Morrisseau said. "There are many many, very, very decent people in the active duty military. I know this," he said "--- people who love their country and democracy too, and hate war."
continue....
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Morrisseau wrote that "Iran is no present threat to us or anyone. Their right to enrich uranium under treaties signed by us for the production of nuclear power is clear: and that is all they have so far done. An attack upon that nation now by us, acting alone will constitute an illegal war of aggression under international law. It is illegal under our law as well. I urge you to so advise the President," Morrisseau wrote to Pace, "and urge that he take no such actions. In particular, he must not act in the absense of a full, formal, responsible War Declaration by Congress. That is the Constitutional requirement." If he and Cheney persist, Morrisseau wrote, "than the country must rely upon you, Sir, and our armed forces generally, to resist all illegal orders by Bush or Cheney, and take the gentlemen into custody if necessary.
www.2LTmorrisseau.com
The Lieutenant is a candidate for Congress in Vermont running under this ballot line: Impeach Bush Now. He has called for impeachment of both Bush & Cheney. He is recruiting other "decent and able Citizens" to run for Congress with him, without regard to political party. The goal is to remove all present incumbents from Congress, again without regard to party. He call's this effort "Lieutenant Morrisseau's Rebellion".
Hehe?.Now.. who says that I am the only crazy left in this world..??
I SALUTE THIS MAN WHOLE HEARTEDLY
Signed Up:
Jul 11, 2006Comments: 0 · Posts: 801 · Topics: 43
thanks for the update. see I told ya! there are folks here who are willing to step up.
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Well
You are right ...but please dont expose anymore about my secret love affair with the YU.ES.EH
Damn bitch is like my damn EX?.a bitter sweet something..
God? I hate the damn thing.. ???????still looking for her faults..
Aint that romantic..??
but thank you for noticing it...I mean it.
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Do you remember anything about the nature of liberty statue in NY..??
History of it..??
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
If not?..
It supposes to be a symbol of a freedom? for everyone I mean? EVERYONE
FREEDOM?
ARE WE FREE..??
Damn bushit and neocons has made sure that we are NOT
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
WAKE UP AMERICA
THIS TIME IS FOR REAL??!!
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Lmao,,, I am not Americans?.but I fight for the Americans freedom every dam days..
Romantic..!!
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
We as..??
I am talking with this sane people not you?.do you really got this urge to meddling with something that is no concern of you..??
What are you really understand is Oink.. or not Oink, that?s all for you to know? do you see any OINK in the post above..??
Now go and take a bath in your own shit..! while I take my meds to deal with PIGS like you..
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Oink....oink...

Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
sure... er... OINK...
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Do you secretly love me..??
You mothering me and remind me about my pills
OINK....lol
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
And about this goddamn fantasy world.. how come that I think you live in fantasy world doc ?
One of us must be wrong, I am holding something that called "reality" you as aqua ever encounter that..?
I mean.. your sign is Air shit.. but you are aqua? water thing..! and you are confused as hell..
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Ohh it s all about darkness or lightness... and not the reality?lmao
Cool...
MUM....
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Listen up Oink... err pig... err sorry
Live your life and let others live their own? is that ok with you...? or I should bust your ass everytime?
You have a god damn issue with yourself call it ?boredom# .keep it to your self and don?t seek of getting attentions in ?this way? asshole?
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
M lady...
Mostly agree with you... America is not the America that is supposed to be.
Land of freedom is turned out to be the land of assholes (no offence).
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Primepig is a good instance..
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
See the above post asshole?
You don?t read bitch? you just answer?. lmao
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Yeh..
I love Chavez... any problem with it..?? His latest statement makes me chuckle, but in reality... he is right...
NOW.. REALTY?
Ring a bell??. bitch????
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Ohhh the red pill says? DO NOT TALK TO IDIOTS WHILE TAKING THIS?
I ?ll take that advice?
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Idiot.....
03:30 in the morning in east coast and you still bullshitting..
Ever had a life asshole..?? naw?that?s why I am laughing at you mixed bastard?
Battle on?.
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Sorry you...
You are just an asshole..what else can i say..?? asshole? do I need to make it graphically bitch???
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Lmao?. 04:30? lmao.
To tell you the truth bastard?. Rest of the world give a FUCK for what time zone are you live in idiot.
I said it generally..
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Thank you idiot? you gave more information that I ever needed about American people. And their thoughts?
MORE?. MORE.. IDIOT
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Do I care where you live?. Lol
Do you wanted to give your personal address to me too..
Fuck you
You made a fuk ass of yourself and that?s about it..
Now?. Go and hide yourself somewhere idiot ?indigo wanna be? BOY..
Shut the fuck up
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Lmao..
You are just enough to trash that topic idiot.. I am mot going to you answer back?. So do as you wish..
But remember one thing.. FUkYOU ASSHOLE..
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
You are damn scared..be cause the topic says something that you don?t like?. TYPICAL American trash
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
OINK..OINK..
Signed Up:
May 18, 2006Comments: 0 · Posts: 6936 · Topics: 267
Qbone, you have your facts a bit mixed up. The Statue of Liberty does in fact symbolize freedom, but not for the world as a whole, but rather it's Mother of Exiles, greeting millions of immigrants and embodying hope and opportunity for those seeking a better life in America. IN AMERICA. While it does stir the desire for freedom in people all over the world. It represents the United States itself.
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Thanks for explanation,,,
I didn?t wanted to dramatises its existence as all Americans know that already, symbol of exiles and IMMIGRANTS you said..
Thank you?!
PIG is against it, that?s why I call the bastard PrimePIG ?for short?. PIG..
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
And one morething..!!
She is not representing the America.... but the idea of being free! The Statue of Liberty was presented by the people of France to the people of the United States in 1886 to honour the friendship between the two nations.
Today, it is recognized as a symbol of liberty throughout the world.
The Statue of Liberty may have been created by the genius of a few visionaries, but the concept she represents speaks to the minds and resonates in the hearts of ordinary men and women everywhere.
Now PIG? ?PIGS? are against it.. and it is my duty to defend her honour?!
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
This kind of idiots are destroying America.... not the Muslims or Osama bin laden. Or what ever..
Mixed bastards (indigo) lmao.. that don?t even know or respect the history,,, just wanted to have good time ONLINE.. they don?t even have a real life.
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Lamo?. Dream on
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Always Look on the Bright Side of Life
Some things in life are bad
They can really make you mad
Other things just make you swear and curse.
When you're chewing on life's gristle
Don't grumble, give a whistle
And this'll help things turn out for the best...
And...always look on the bright side of life...
Always look on the light side of life...
If life seems jolly rotten
There's something you've forgotten
And that's to laugh and smile and dance and sing.
When you're feeling in the dumps
Don't be silly chumps
Just purse your lips and whistle - that's the thing.
And...always look on the bright side of life...
Always look on the light side of life...
For life is quite absurd
And death's the final word
You must always face the curtain with a bow.
Forget about your sin - give the audience a grin
Enjoy it - it's your last chance anyhow.
So always look on the bright side of death
Just before you draw your terminal breath
Life's a piece of shit
When you look at it
Life's a laugh and death's a joke, it's true.
You'll see it's all a show
Keep 'em laughing as you go
Just remember that the last laugh is on you.
And always look on the bright side of life...
Always look on the right side of life...
(Come on guys, cheer up!)
Always look on the bright side of life...
Always look on the bright side of life...
(Worse things happen at sea, you know.)
Always look on the bright side of life...
(I mean - what have you got to lose?)
(You know, you come from nothing - you're going back to nothing.
What have you lost? Nothing!)
Always look on the right side of life...
Always Look on the Bright Side of Life (from Monty Python)
Listen: LoFi | Download | Send-Card | Chords
From: A Faire To Remember
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
You think that they are silly?. you piece of shit..?? PIG..
You cant change anything.. unless I let you?..bow and suck?.PIG?.
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Oink oink? pice of shit.. shut the fuck up?.
Signed Up:
May 18, 2006Comments: 0 · Posts: 6936 · Topics: 267
Hey, Prime. I saw on the news last night that the citizens of Boston are wanting to take the CITGO sign down near Fenway Park and replace it with an American flag. I think they should. Citgo is an Guatamalan company.
Signed Up:
May 18, 2006Comments: 0 · Posts: 6936 · Topics: 267
SOrry, I meant Venezuela...but my brain typed Guatamala
Signed Up:
Jul 11, 2006Comments: 0 · Posts: 801 · Topics: 43
665,000 iraq dead
is the current estimate since invasion began
if we had not done this war,
665,000 iraqis would not be dead
damn
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
665,000 is an ?Officially? released death toll (previously was 40,000) lamo?my sources says it?s more than1, 200,000.
Adding the first Gulf war and the results of UN Illegal sanctions? death toll were between 1,300,000 and 2,000,000?
Death toll (civilians only) is about 3-4 mill since 91 till now..!
Holocaust genocide?..! As I said it before. American people are responsible for this mess?you vote for your regime. They do shit...but you are responsible for the shit anyway..! It?s not going to help by just saying that? (I didn?t vote for the bastard)? why don?t you fight against then..??
Like 3,000 American soldier death?. My ass? mopre than 15,000 soldier death + 55,000 permanently damaged?. And for the rest they?ve got psychological problem.. for the rest of their lives.
Couple of months ago in Turkey? many stores and shopping centres had a sign in front of their stores?"Because of the Hezbollah war with the Israel"
?Jews are not welcome? ?.this will going to happen to the Americans soon? wait and see.. people outside of US border shit are not stupid as you may think.
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
3 years ago? the bastard in the white house thought he could capture the Iraq with only 50,000 soldiers..! In one week
Same bastards? still fighting to death in Afghanistan for 5 years and still wondering what the hell is going on?!
Almost 3 trillion $ has been spent for fight against (imaginary terror)?millions are dead?! Lives being destroyed... for only one reason? an addicted alcoholic asshole in W.H. wanted in this way.
The decider?.
To the outside world?a Nation ruled by the bastard? are bastards...
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Your tax money.....is killing humans....!
Don?t play as martyr... When they ?vet return the favour...
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
Why is the American press silent on the report of 655,000 Iraqi deaths?
Publication time: 14 October 2006, 12:37
The US media is virtually silent on a new scientific study that estimates the Iraqi death toll from the US war at 655,000. The study, conducted by Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health and funded by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was posted Wednesday on the web site of the British medical journal, the Lancet.
The study is the only systematic estimate of the number of Iraqi civilians and military personnel to have died as a result of the US invasion and occupation to be brought to the attention of the American and international public.
Unlike previous estimates, which were based on reviews of media reports or tallies made by the US-backed Iraqi government, the Johns Hopkins study was carried out by Iraqi physicians who interviewed-often at great personal risk-nearly 2,000 families spread across the country, utilizing standard and widely used statistical methods to arrive at an objective estimate of the death toll from the war and occupation. The vast majority of the reported deaths were substantiated by death certificates.
The study concluded with a 95 percent degree of certainty that the number of "excess deaths" in Iraq since the invasion-the number of people who have died in excess of the number that would be expected on the basis of pre-invasion mortality rates-is between 393,000 and 943,000. The figure of 655,000 is given as the most likely number. This represents an astonishing 2.5 percent of the entire Iraqi population.
The researchers further estimated that about 600,000 of the deaths were due to violence in some form, including gunshots, air strikes and bombings. They concluded that US and allied military forces directly caused at least 31 percent-or 186,000-of the violent deaths.
Some 336,000 people, or 56 percent of those killed in violent actions since the invasion, died from gunshot wounds. The study also found that the number of violent deaths in Iraq has steadily increased every year since the invasion. In the period from June 2005 to June 2006, the researchers found a nearly four-fold increase in the mortality rate relative to pre-invasion levels.
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
There can be no legitimate doubts about the credibility of the study. Lancet is one of the oldest and most prestigious peer-reviewed medical publications in the world. The Johns Hopkins public health school is the largest in the world, and regularly ranks as the top public health school in the United States. The journal article was reviewed and approved for publication by four independent scientific experts in the area.
It is difficult to overestimate the significance of the report, even if one assumes its low-end estimate of 393,000 Iraqi deaths to be correct. It demonstrates that the American intervention in Iraq has produced a social and humanitarian catastrophe of historical dimensions, with vast political implications not only in the Middle East, but throughout the world and, above all, in the United States itself.
By any objective standard, the report merits front-page coverage in every major newspaper in the country and extensive discussion and reporting on television news broadcasts. Yet the response of the US press has been to virtually ignore the report and limit its coverage to news accounts on inside pages which report, uncritically, unsubstantiated statements by government and military officials dismissing the report as "not credible."
In burying the story, the New York Times and Washington Post have played a particularly significant role. The original articles published by these newspapers on Wednesday were relegated to the inside pages: in the Times on page 8, in the post
The Post decided to bury the story in its back pages despite the fact that the article it published vouched for the scientific validity the Johns Hopkins study, noting that it, and an earlier report on Iraqi deaths published by the same team, "are the only ones to estimate mortality in Iraq using scientific methods." The "cluster sampling" technique used by the scientists, the newspaper wrote, "is used to estimate mortality in famines and after natural disasters."
Minimal coverage in the press continued on Thursday, despite the fact that the issue was raised by a reporter at a White House press conference on Wednesday. President Bush contemptuously dismissed the report, stating that it was not credible. He was not challenged and the question was not followed up by any of the other reporters at the news conference.
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
study's casualty figures. General George Casey, the commander of US forces in Iraq, admitted that he had not bothered to read the report, but nevertheless concluded that it did not have "much credibility at all."
A spokesman for British Prime Minister Tony Blair said that the figure of 655,000 killed is "not one we believe to be anywhere near accurate." Iraqi government officials likewise declared that the figure was "exaggerated."
On Thursday, neither the Times nor the Post published an editorial on the Johns Hopkins report, or even a follow-up article on the report and the response of the Bush administration.
There was not one challenge in the establishment media to the official attempts to disparage the report. Instead, the minimal coverage on Thursday was largely devoted to reporting the statements by Bush, Casey, Blair and the Iraqi stooge regime. The Los Angeles Times, for example, published a story on its inside pages, "Iraq Disputes Claim of 600,000 War Dead," reporting the statements by the Iraqi government. The newspaper added its voice to the chorus by remarking that it had conducted its own survey and reached a figure of 50,000 killed.
The attempts to discredit the report are not backed up by any factual or methodological arguments. The administration and its supporters assume, correctly, that they can simply make unsubstantiated claims and the media will not challenge them.
Lee Roberts, a co-author of the study, noted in an interview with the radio program Democracy Now! on Thursday that the cluster survey approach the researchers used "is the standard way of measuring mortality in very poor countries where the government isn't very functional or in times of war." He pointed out that both the United Nations and the US government have used the method in determining mortality, including after the Kosovo and Afghan wars. "Most ironically," he said, "the US government has been spending millions of dollars per year... to train NGOs and UN workers to do cluster surveys to measure mortality in times of wars and disasters."
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 13612 · Topics: 756
With its silence, the media is once again taking its cue from the government. It does not challenge Bush's ignorant and cold-blooded dismissal of the Johns Hopkins report, just as it did not challenge Bush's offhand remark at a December, 2005 press conference that 30,000 Iraqis, "more or less," had been killed since the March, 2003 US invasion-an absurdly low estimate.
The corporate-owned-and-controlled media have buried this story because they do not want the American people to know the truth of what is happening in Iraq.
They want to conceal this truth-as they have done consistently since the war began-because they are complicit in a massive war crime in Iraq, and continue to support the bloodletting by the US military.
The Johns Hopkins report, by revealing the colossal dimensions of the death and destruction wreaked by the United States in Iraq, shatters the edifice of lies that has been erected in an attempt to deceive the people and justify the war-from the phony claims of weapons of mass destruction and Iraq-Al Qaeda ties, to the current claims of a war for "freedom and democracy" and the overarching deception of the "war on terrorism."
The report inevitably highlights the culpability of the media itself, which has combined an acceptance of unprecedented censorship by the military with self-censorship and deliberate misinformation in order to whitewash an imperialist war for oil and geo-strategic domination of the Middle East.
The scale of mass killing revealed in the Johns Hopkins study published by the Lancet stands as an indictment of the entire American ruling elite, both of its political parties-Democratic no less than Republican-and all of its official institutions, among which the media has played a particularly sordid role.
What the corporate, political and media establishment fear are the explosive social and political implications of growing popular revulsion over the crimes of US imperialism in Iraq and around the world, combined with mounting anger over relentless attacks on working people's social conditions and democratic rights. The entire political system is being exposed and discredited before the eyes of the people. Such a process inevitably brings with it revolutionary consequences.
By Joe Kay and Barry Grey
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 1600 · Topics: 80
He has to be some kind of a shut in.
Signed Up:
Jan 18, 2005Comments: 3 · Posts: 15387 · Topics: 830
or a nut case who if he would come here maybe we could lock him up he is asking us to fight against our own Government.