Posted by Arielle83She was just elected to the US house of representatives. Only roughly 14% of the people in the district she represents voted, and the congressman she unseated didn't make any effort to campaign against her because he thought his seat was secure.
Who is this?
I’m not into American politics
Posted by Black-MambaPosted by EndlessOk than how is Germany a colder country doing it
I find hilarious that you bring venezuela in that tittle, using 100% solar energy would be more feasible in a country with so much sun uptime and no seasons, hard to say that about 75% of the US states lmao
Are you saying that America doesn't have warm temperatures for half the year?
Most states on the bottom half are bristling hotclick to expand
Posted by Black-MambaPosted by EndlessEven half is better than nonePosted by Black-MambaPosted by EndlessOk than how is Germany a colder country doing it
I find hilarious that you bring venezuela in that tittle, using 100% solar energy would be more feasible in a country with so much sun uptime and no seasons, hard to say that about 75% of the US states lmao
Are you saying that America doesn't have warm temperatures for half the year?
Most states on the bottom half are bristling hot
germany is generating almost 20% their energy from wind, solar energy only produced close to 7% , hardly enough to maintain a state, quite a contrasting difference as both projects started at the same time
PV installation figures are dropping rapidly in Germany. The 2014 total was 1,899 MWp, falling from 3,309 MWp in 2013, according to a report by EurObserv'ER, some say that after the Renewable Energy Sources Act [EEG], there was a market collapse that resulted in a loss of more than 80% growth, germany is not meeting any development in the solar energy field
"Are you saying that America doesn't have warm temperatures for half the year?"
are you going to have energy only half the year?
"Most states on the bottom half are bristling hot"
but those states cant sustain the entire country, also most of those states are busy using their land for farming.
farming and wind power is a good mix, but the US is way to big to pull that out
US need nuclear fusion energy, theres no way around that, and development is going strong.
Nuclear has way too many risksclick to expand
Posted by LadyNeptunehttps://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3
Hydroelectric energy
Biomass energy
Geothermal power
Tidal, ocean, and hot hydrogen fusion.
Y’all act like solar power is the only green power source out there.
Posted by EndlessSolar has limited application in terms of generating power for current societal requirements.
I find hilarious that you bring venezuela in that tittle, using 100% solar energy would be more feasible in a country with so much sun uptime and no seasons, hard to say that about 75% of the US states lmao
Posted by CancerOnTheCuspI love how you had to make a repeat thread just to frame your twisted perspective lolPosted by LadyNeptunehttps://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3
Hydroelectric energy
Biomass energy
Geothermal power
Tidal, ocean, and hot hydrogen fusion.
Y’all act like solar power is the only green power source out there.
Of the total sources of power in the US, 62.9% are fossil source, 20% nuclear.
The remaining 17,1% is "renewable", which includes hydro, wind, and solar.
As for fusion.....please provide where fusion is at a scale where it supplies a city block with power. I'll wait.
Hydro, solar, and wind only have limited application. Wind affects wildlife, and hydro has been attacked by environmental groups.
Same with tidal.
The green new deal sought to eliminate nuclear, even though molten salt tech is already available, and a much better alteranative, but good luck getting that going.
But, carry on.click to expand
Posted by FireStarterGot any useful input? Thought not.Posted by CancerOnTheCuspI love how you had to make a repeat thread just to frame your twisted perspective lolPosted by LadyNeptunehttps://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3
Hydroelectric energy
Biomass energy
Geothermal power
Tidal, ocean, and hot hydrogen fusion.
Y’all act like solar power is the only green power source out there.
Of the total sources of power in the US, 62.9% are fossil source, 20% nuclear.
The remaining 17,1% is "renewable", which includes hydro, wind, and solar.
As for fusion.....please provide where fusion is at a scale where it supplies a city block with power. I'll wait.
Hydro, solar, and wind only have limited application. Wind affects wildlife, and hydro has been attacked by environmental groups.
Same with tidal.
The green new deal sought to eliminate nuclear, even though molten salt tech is already available, and a much better alteranative, but good luck getting that going.
But, carry on.click to expand
Posted by CancerOnTheCuspI only have facts, so not useful to you.Posted by FireStarterGot any useful input? Thought not.Posted by CancerOnTheCuspI love how you had to make a repeat thread just to frame your twisted perspective lolPosted by LadyNeptunehttps://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3
Hydroelectric energy
Biomass energy
Geothermal power
Tidal, ocean, and hot hydrogen fusion.
Y’all act like solar power is the only green power source out there.
Of the total sources of power in the US, 62.9% are fossil source, 20% nuclear.
The remaining 17,1% is "renewable", which includes hydro, wind, and solar.
As for fusion.....please provide where fusion is at a scale where it supplies a city block with power. I'll wait.
Hydro, solar, and wind only have limited application. Wind affects wildlife, and hydro has been attacked by environmental groups.
Same with tidal.
The green new deal sought to eliminate nuclear, even though molten salt tech is already available, and a much better alteranative, but good luck getting that going.
But, carry on.click to expand
Posted by FireStarterBy all means present them.Posted by CancerOnTheCuspI only have facts, so not useful to you.Posted by FireStarterGot any useful input? Thought not.Posted by CancerOnTheCuspI love how you had to make a repeat thread just to frame your twisted perspective lolPosted by LadyNeptunehttps://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3
Hydroelectric energy
Biomass energy
Geothermal power
Tidal, ocean, and hot hydrogen fusion.
Y’all act like solar power is the only green power source out there.
Of the total sources of power in the US, 62.9% are fossil source, 20% nuclear.
The remaining 17,1% is "renewable", which includes hydro, wind, and solar.
As for fusion.....please provide where fusion is at a scale where it supplies a city block with power. I'll wait.
Hydro, solar, and wind only have limited application. Wind affects wildlife, and hydro has been attacked by environmental groups.
Same with tidal.
The green new deal sought to eliminate nuclear, even though molten salt tech is already available, and a much better alteranative, but good luck getting that going.
But, carry on.click to expand
Posted by CancerOnTheCuspHa don't project at me. I have always been able to separate objective fact and subjective opinion. But if you want to post examples go ahead. You will find it is impossible however.Posted by FireStarterBy all means present them.Posted by CancerOnTheCuspI only have facts, so not useful to you.Posted by FireStarterGot any useful input? Thought not.Posted by CancerOnTheCuspI love how you had to make a repeat thread just to frame your twisted perspective lolPosted by LadyNeptunehttps://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3
Hydroelectric energy
Biomass energy
Geothermal power
Tidal, ocean, and hot hydrogen fusion.
Y’all act like solar power is the only green power source out there.
Of the total sources of power in the US, 62.9% are fossil source, 20% nuclear.
The remaining 17,1% is "renewable", which includes hydro, wind, and solar.
As for fusion.....please provide where fusion is at a scale where it supplies a city block with power. I'll wait.
Hydro, solar, and wind only have limited application. Wind affects wildlife, and hydro has been attacked by environmental groups.
Same with tidal.
The green new deal sought to eliminate nuclear, even though molten salt tech is already available, and a much better alteranative, but good luck getting that going.
But, carry on.
And your opinions do not constitute facts.
I've noticed in your other posts you tend to conflate the two.click to expand
Posted by elllleYeah, sure.
People are so afraid of her. I love it.![]()
Posted by LittleStar
Yes, because Venezuela hasn't been sabotaged by the US who created the economic crisis and then blamed socialism isn't now also setting up a puppet candidate to get control over their oil.
Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by EndlessSolar has limited application in terms of generating power for current societal requirements.
I find hilarious that you bring venezuela in that tittle, using 100% solar energy would be more feasible in a country with so much sun uptime and no seasons, hard to say that about 75% of the US states lmao
It's not really about 'green', the whole bit is a mechanism to force socialism on the US.
Occasio-Cortez site took down the proposal based on the reaction among the public.
So much for having the courage of one's convictions.click to expand
Posted by EndlessHit the wrong button, and too lazy to retype.Posted by CancerOnTheCuspPosted by EndlessSolar has limited application in terms of generating power for current societal requirements.
I find hilarious that you bring venezuela in that tittle, using 100% solar energy would be more feasible in a country with so much sun uptime and no seasons, hard to say that about 75% of the US states lmao
It's not really about 'green', the whole bit is a mechanism to force socialism on the US.
Occasio-Cortez site took down the proposal based on the reaction among the public.
So much for having the courage of one's convictions.
what do you mean by "limited applications"? I know I extrapolated to a degree but I wasnt aware of more problems with solar than the uptime and the storage part.
socialism in the US would be crazy, your capitalist system is already mega corrupt, if you people go red, how more corrupt could you get lmao
"Occasio-Cortez site took down the proposal based on the reaction among the public"
that's the best thing she could do, it was a stupid proposal.click to expand
We'd love to hear your thoughts! If you're not logged in, you can still share your feedback below. Your input helps us improve the experience for everyone. To post your own content or join the conversation, please log in or create an account.