Mueller Report Released - DAMAGING
This topic was created in the Politics forum by _Dazed on Thursday, April 18, 2019 and has 21 replies.
"The investigation continued under then-Director Comey for the next seven weeks until May 9,2017, when President Trump fired Camey as FBI Director — an action which is analyzed in Volume II of the report.
On May 17, 2017, Acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed the Special Counseland authorized him to conduct the investigation that Comey had confirmed in his congressionaltestimony, as well as matters arising directly from the investigation, and any other matters withinthe scope of 28 C.F,R. g 600A(a), which generally covers efforts to interfere with or obstruct theinvestigation.
President Trump reacted negatively to the Special Counsel's appointment. He told adviser's that it was the end of his presidency, sought to have Attorney General Jefferson (JeQ) Sessions unreouse from the Russia investigation and to have the Special Counsel removed, and engaged in efforts to curtail the Special Counsel's investigation and prevent the disclosure of evidence to it,including through public and private contacts with potential witnesses"
On May 17, 2017, Acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed the Special Counseland authorized him to conduct the investigation that Comey had confirmed in his congressionaltestimony, as well as matters arising directly from the investigation, and any other matters withinthe scope of 28 C.F,R. g 600A(a), which generally covers efforts to interfere with or obstruct theinvestigation.
President Trump reacted negatively to the Special Counsel's appointment. He told adviser's that it was the end of his presidency, sought to have Attorney General Jefferson (JeQ) Sessions unreouse from the Russia investigation and to have the Special Counsel removed, and engaged in efforts to curtail the Special Counsel's investigation and prevent the disclosure of evidence to it,including through public and private contacts with potential witnesses"
"Further, the Office learned that some of the individuals we' interviewed or whose conductwe investigated — including some associated with the Trump Campaign~elated relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption oi that do not provide for long-tern retention of data or communications records. In such cases, the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements though comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with other known facts.
Accordingly, while this report embodies factual and legal determinations that the Office believes to be accurate and complete to the greatest extent possible, given these identified gapa,the Office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report"
Accordingly, while this report embodies factual and legal determinations that the Office believes to be accurate and complete to the greatest extent possible, given these identified gapa,the Office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events described in the report"
"The Trump Campaign showed interest in the WikiLeaks releases and, in the summer and fall of 2016, REDACTED. WikiLeaks's first Clinton-related release, REDACTED, the Trump Campaign stayed in contact REDACTED about WikiLeaks's activities. The investigation was unable to resolve REDACTED WikiLcaks's release of the stolen Podesta emails on October 7,2016, the same day a video from years earlier was published of Trump using graphic language about women."
No collusion or obstruction.
The squealing is really going to start if those criminal referrals are acted on by AG Barr. They go to the heart of how this process got started.
But....
I suggest you urge your congressperson to go forward on impeachment proceedings if you really believe it is damaging. I'm sure the public in general is going to buy the bullshit.
NOT
The squealing is really going to start if those criminal referrals are acted on by AG Barr. They go to the heart of how this process got started.
But....
I suggest you urge your congressperson to go forward on impeachment proceedings if you really believe it is damaging. I'm sure the public in general is going to buy the bullshit.
NOT
LOL @ most of the "contact with WikiLeaks" being redacted
"Several hours later, WikiLeaks sent a Twitter direct message to Donald Trump Jr., "A PAC runanti-Trump site putintrump.org 'is about to launch. The PAC is a recycled pro-Iraq war PAC. We have guessed the password. It is 'putintrump,' See'About' for who is behind it. Any comments?
Several hours later, Trump Jr, emailed a variety of senior campaign staff:
Guys I got a weird Twitter DM from wikileaks. See below. I tried the password and it works and the about section they reference contains the next pic in terms of who is behind it. Not sure if this is anything but it seems like it's really wikileaks asking me as I follow them and it is a DM. Do you know the people mentioned and what the conspiracy they are looking for could be? These are just screen shots but it's a fully built out page claiming to be a PAC let me know your thought's and if we want to look into it.
Trump Jr. attached a screenshot of the "About" page for the unlaunched site PutinTrump.org. The
next day (after the website had launched publicly), Trump Jr. sent a direct message to WikiLeaks:
"Off the record, I don't know who that is but I' ll ask amund. Thanks 3"~sr
On October 3, 2016, WikiLeaks sent another direct message to Trump Jr,, asking "you
guys" to help disseminate a link alleging candidate Clinton had advocated using a drone to target Julian Assange. Trump Jr, responded that he already "had done so," and asked, "what's behind this Wednesday leak I keep reading about? WikiLeaks did not respond.
On October 12, 2016, WikiLeaks wrote again that it was "great to see you and your dad talking about our publications. Strongly suggest your dad tweets this link if he mentions uswlsearch,tk.'us~ WikiLeaks wrote that the link would help Trump in "digging through" leaked emails and stated, "we just released Podesta emails Part 4."
Two days later, Trump Jr. publicly tweeted the wlsearch.tk link."
Several hours later, Trump Jr, emailed a variety of senior campaign staff:
Guys I got a weird Twitter DM from wikileaks. See below. I tried the password and it works and the about section they reference contains the next pic in terms of who is behind it. Not sure if this is anything but it seems like it's really wikileaks asking me as I follow them and it is a DM. Do you know the people mentioned and what the conspiracy they are looking for could be? These are just screen shots but it's a fully built out page claiming to be a PAC let me know your thought's and if we want to look into it.
Trump Jr. attached a screenshot of the "About" page for the unlaunched site PutinTrump.org. The
next day (after the website had launched publicly), Trump Jr. sent a direct message to WikiLeaks:
"Off the record, I don't know who that is but I' ll ask amund. Thanks 3"~sr
On October 3, 2016, WikiLeaks sent another direct message to Trump Jr,, asking "you
guys" to help disseminate a link alleging candidate Clinton had advocated using a drone to target Julian Assange. Trump Jr, responded that he already "had done so," and asked, "what's behind this Wednesday leak I keep reading about? WikiLeaks did not respond.
On October 12, 2016, WikiLeaks wrote again that it was "great to see you and your dad talking about our publications. Strongly suggest your dad tweets this link if he mentions uswlsearch,tk.'us~ WikiLeaks wrote that the link would help Trump in "digging through" leaked emails and stated, "we just released Podesta emails Part 4."
Two days later, Trump Jr. publicly tweeted the wlsearch.tk link."
That sure is a sea of black. LOL
Posted by HapisI DEMAND YOU CHANGE YOUR SN FOR THE 2834092384092348TH TIME!
I DEMAND 6 MORE YEARS OF INVESTIGATION!!!!
I mean.. Whole sections dedicated to Trump Jr and Kushner in contact with Russian officials (emails and phone calls) seeking information on Clinton LOL
BTW... In case you want to read it for yourself.
I'm only on page 130 out of 448 LOL
I'm only on page 130 out of 448 LOL
Posted by Phantom_LimboWhat was lied about? Please be specific.Posted by _DazedI'm honestly shocked at what a corrupt lapdog Barr is. I _knew_ he would do what he could to help out Trump, but I was honestly naive enough to think he wouldn't...well, just fucking lie.
I mean.. Whole sections dedicated to Trump Jr and Kushner in contact with Russian officials (emails and phone calls) seeking information on Clinton LOLclick to expand
"Finally, although the evidence of contacts between Campaign officials and Russia
affiliated individuals may not have been sufficient to establish or sustain criminal charges, several
U.S. persons connected to the Campaign made false, statements about those contacts and took other steps to obstruct the Office's investigation and those of Congress. This Office has therefore charged some of those individuals with making false statements and obstructing justice"
affiliated individuals may not have been sufficient to establish or sustain criminal charges, several
U.S. persons connected to the Campaign made false, statements about those contacts and took other steps to obstruct the Office's investigation and those of Congress. This Office has therefore charged some of those individuals with making false statements and obstructing justice"
Posted by HapisYou nastayPosted by nikkistarIt wasnt me..... it was da RussiansPosted by HapisI DEMAND YOU CHANGE YOUR SN FOR THE 2834092384092348TH TIME!
I DEMAND 6 MORE YEARS OF INVESTIGATION!!!!
I about wikileaked all over myself when they cyber attacked.click to expand
"Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him"
Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
No collusion or obstruction.
Indeed, there is no collusion, as collusion involves making false stuff about someone, what they wanted was to use leaked private information against clinton (her fault to be so full of shit too) and wikileaks (and probably russia) did indeed (kinda?) coöperate, not illegal what happened, but very scummy really.
and although the administration did not commit direct obstruction, boy they did wanted to, now, even when there was no crime (apparently) these people are so immoral they immediately got shit scared, some started making false statement and lying and those are fucked up now for that, but I doubt a seasoned asshole like trump made a mistake like that, if nixon managed to get away, trump probably can too.
it's all just a big butt fuck as usual
"We received the President's written responses in late November 2018.~ In December 2018,we informed counsel of the insufficiency of those responses in several respects.' We noted, among other things, that the President stated on more than 30 occasions that he "does not 'recall' or'remember' or have an 'independent recollection'" of information called for by the questions. Other answers were "incomplete or imprecise."7 The written responses„we informed counsel,"demonstrate the inadequacy of the written format, as we have had no opportunity to ask followup questions that would ensure complete answers and potentially refresh your client's recollection clarify the extent or nature of his lack of recollection." We again requested an in-person interview, limited to certain topics, advising the President's counsel that "[t]his is the President's opportunity to voluntarily provide us with information for us to evaluate in the context of all of the evidence we have gathered/" s The President declined."
*Bunch of redacted stuff*
"Recognizing that the President would not be interviewed voluntarily, we considered whether to issue a subpoena for his testimony. We viewed the written answers to be inadequate.But at that point, our investigation had made significant progress and had produced substantial evidence for our report. We thus weighed the costs of potentially lengthy constitutional litigation,with resulting delay in finishing our investigation, against the anticipated benefits for our investigation and report. As explained in Volume II, Section II.B., we determined that the substantial quantity of information we had obtained &om other sources allowed us to draw relevant factual conclusions on intent and credibility, which are often inferred from circumstantial evidence and assessed without direct testimony from the subject of the investigation."
"Recognizing that the President would not be interviewed voluntarily, we considered whether to issue a subpoena for his testimony. We viewed the written answers to be inadequate.But at that point, our investigation had made significant progress and had produced substantial evidence for our report. We thus weighed the costs of potentially lengthy constitutional litigation,with resulting delay in finishing our investigation, against the anticipated benefits for our investigation and report. As explained in Volume II, Section II.B., we determined that the substantial quantity of information we had obtained &om other sources allowed us to draw relevant factual conclusions on intent and credibility, which are often inferred from circumstantial evidence and assessed without direct testimony from the subject of the investigation."
The written answers from Trump are a must read. What a joke
Leave Your Feedback
We'd love to hear your thoughts! If you're not logged in, you can still share your feedback below. Your input helps us improve the experience for everyone. To post your own content or join the conversation, please log in or create an account.
Related Topics
Two weeks ago i met a Scorpio man and the chemistry was on fire... be being a caprocron sun and moon in virgo while him a Scorpio sun, virgo moon and venus in Scorpio.
instant connection!!!
however there is a 3rd person in this person.... his other per
@simsim88
Joined: May 03, 2017 · Topics: 29 · Posts: 106
Been seeing an amazing Virgo woman for about 3 months now. We've been friends for 5-6 years until we started dating. She is a completely different person in a relationship, but I'm enjoying every new thing I learn about her. She just confuses the hell out
@justledouxit86
Joined: Apr 15, 2019 · Topics: 10 · Posts: 149
This is supposed to be our shining year, but I see a lot of Sagittarians not happy. One just lost her job, and the others are depressed and not living their best lives. I am doing okay as of right now, but should I be worried?
@Easha23000us
Joined: Jan 02, 2014 · Topics: 110 · Posts: 1381
I am trying to have an input on ‘special’ sexuality of ViP which seems to be not conventional. I am failing to get responses so I want to share a little piece so you know what I am looking for from others to share...
...he always get it so deeply crafted
@Gemitatti
Joined: Apr 05, 2019 · Topics: 15 · Posts: 298
explanation in astrology?
and these men don't appear to have many vices except their nutty attachment to their religion (i'm not talking casual faith but deep roots faith) and their secret obsession with sex. excess virtue is a vice i don't care. i'm not
@virgoOPPP
Joined: Mar 24, 2019 · Topics: 282 · Posts: 10595
I've read conflicting views on virgos doing disappearing acts at starts of relationships etc.
I'd like opinions from virgos or those who know them pleaseee
Some say they have a lot going on and need space, others say its cause they're developing feels??
@aquatar1
Joined: Oct 22, 2018 · Topics: 21 · Posts: 333
Prayer to the Holy Spirit (Pray for 3 days or 3 Hours Straight)
Holy Spirit, You who make me see everything and showed me the way to reach my ideals, You who gave me the divine gift to forgive and forget the wrong that is done to me an You who are in all
@bigdogwv
Joined: Apr 08, 2019 · Topics: 3 · Posts: 3
Trying to convince myself I'm fine and moving on. Other side tells me, "send a message, reach out and there is hope".
That cancer man is out of my life. Well technically his not physically present in my life. Other side tells me, "try to seek help from
@Mag96
Joined: Mar 31, 2019 · Topics: 4 · Posts: 36
This predicament requires some context so I’ll try and break it down as chronologically and accurately as possible without taking up too much of your time but bear with me as it’s definitely long.
So, background brief; began talking to this guy casually
@aquariancrybaby
Joined: Apr 17, 2019 · Topics: 3 · Posts: 27
Have you ever walked away from a dick because it was small when flaccid?
Those that stuck around for the small flaccid dick, were you still disappointed once erect, or were you pleasantly surprised?
Have you ever come across a show-er, that was disappoi
@_Dazed
Joined: Feb 18, 2019 · Topics: 250 · Posts: 12626