Protesters Pull Down Confederate Monument in Durham

Posted by EvilHare
www.breibart.com/protestors_durham_monument/

This was a very interesting article... It explained everything so well.

Every. One. Should. Look. At. It.

I guess it's ok to destroy property now? It's 100% ok to break the law?

Posted by LordComplexity

Posted by Ssuperman
I guess it's ok to destroy property now? It's 100% ok to break the law?

I guess it's okay to be a faggot that puts law over morality now? It's 100% ok to break morality like a total douchenozzel?

click to expand

You mean like your "wife beating" mentality is above the law?

Posted by Ssuperman
I guess it's ok to destroy property now? It's 100% ok to break the law?

I put this stuff in the same mindset of the Taliban , ISIS, or other regimes.

Those doing this at least are smart enough not to try Stone Mountain or Mt. Rushmore--yet.

And some of those behind the encouagement of this activity I notice are getting a little nervous-mainly those who have had a high profile in the public sphere. Can't imagine why ?

Posted by CancerOnTheCusp

Posted by Ssuperman
I guess it's ok to destroy property now? It's 100% ok to break the law?

I put this stuff in the same mindset of the Taliban , ISIS, or other regimes.

Those doing this at least are smart enough not to try Stone Mountain or Mt. Rushmore--yet.

And some of those behind the encouagement of this activity I notice are getting a little nervous-mainly those who have had a high profile in the public sphere. Can't imagine why ?

click to expand

People have zero respect these days.

It's funny how people disrespect the law but it's the first people they call when they need/want help

Posted by LordComplexity

Posted by Ssuperman
You mean like your "wife beating" mentality is above the law?

What wife beating mentality? I have almost never been physical with those close to me. The only exceptions are:

1.When me and my bro fought, which was not really instigated by either one of us.

2.When I went overboard 2 different times with my bro because he always antagonizes me physically himself and then my sister because she has antagonized me for years as my molester.

But otherwise I explicitly engage a massive amount of restraint in any given situation to focus on simply physically restraining the person. Almost as if I absolutely cannot physically harm said person. Even worse is that the 1 time I was in physically abusive relationship, it was the other person who was a woman. Because I did neither retaliate nor tried to restrained her. I just shut down because of my past experience with physical abuse growing up. If you are referring to my lack of a regard for a distinction between physical harm to a female and physical harm to a male:

That's because the undeniable truth is that it is sexist to regard women as any more special, any more or less deserving of pain, or more fragile; Than a man. End of story. You can have a problem with violence itself, you can have a problem with harming people physically in general regardless of sex, race, nationality, etc. You can ascribe with conviction to pacifism. But otherwise, anything else is just retarded bullshit and I will have none of it. Meanwhile if you DO want to make that the issue, then it's just a matter of differing philosophy. So you can go suck a dick, kthnx.

click to expand

Lol!!!! You just admitted it

Fact is......women are more fragile. At no point in time are they deserving of physical pain from a man.

Posted by LordComplexity

Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
I put this stuff in the same mindset of the Taliban, ISIS, or other regimes.

Yeaaah that's a GREAT comparison. Cause you know, the fact that the aforementioned groups murder people and do everything they do for the cause of a made up God(or at least, their basis for belief is just sheer irrationality and brainwashing). Isn't in the slightest bit relevant to what is wrong with their actions...

Morality is never about the thing, it's about the context. If it was literal statues of Hitler, you could not possibly say what you are now. Because to destroy His trophy would be to void reverence and respect for him. Which the opposite, having and celebrating respect for him. Is in fact explicitly evil.

Same thing goes for this. Who gives a shit if he was a patriot? Patriotism doesn't mean shit at a time when a country was the equivalent to moral AIDS. If you want to start a new leaf and wipe your sin slate clean. It starts by bluntly acknowledging your wrong and departing from it with absolute conviction. Which means erasing every trace of immortalization of said evil time.

You don't have fucking statues explicitly representing your evil around, if you are trying to get rid of said past and bury it in the all consuming ashes of entropy.

Those doing this at least are smart enough not to try Stone Mountain or Mt. Rushmore--yet.

It's not about Smarts, it's about Balls. In general this protest rebellion shit is just a part of a larger growing sentiment for the people of America to oppose and dethrone their government entirely. But ultimately people are too complacent and pansy to instigate such chaos.

And some of those behind the encouragement of this activity I notice are getting a little nervous-mainly those who have had a high profile in the public sphere. Can't imagine why ?

Because they're pussies.

click to expand

I'm not sure if you truly believe in what you just posted or you're in Rainman mode again. I notice you don't see the irony In the bolded part you posted.

If you look up the thread you'll see a pair of photographs--both show Stalin, the original shows three people, but in one a person is missing-Nikolai Yezhov, head of the secret police during the Great Purge. When he fell out of favor and was executed, it was awkward having photos of him with Stalin and the "official" photo was doctored to literally erase Yezhov.

Happened in history with totalitarian mindsets where the historical record was inconvenient to the offical position of the current day.

Same deal with the statue thing now in the US--attempts to erase or rewrite history by those who find reality awkward or difficult.

As far as the pussy comment-I think you are misinterpreting the motive of self preservation. Do you honestly believe the cultural purge is being ignored/accepted?

The phrase "give me an excuse" comes to mind--and the rabblerousers behind this (at least some of them) realize that if/when the shit hits the fan, they're not going to scuttle away unscathed.

Posted by LordComplexity

Posted by Ssuperman
Lol!!!! You just admitted it.

No more than you admit to being a husband abuser. Cause you know, you ARE a moral faggot. So that means you take it up the butt haaard. But, you think it's better when a man hits a man, than when a man hits a woman. Not by truth, but because you're a retarded puppet. So you have a husband beater mentality, and you beat your husband every saturday night sexually but otherwise every other day of the week you beat him abusefully. Checkmate Faggorito.

Fact is......women are more fragile.

Hell no. Go back to school.

At no point in time are they deserving of physical pain from a man.

So if Hitler was a woman? What then? Let's get real here. When listening to what someone says, it is always pertinent to listen to what they DON'T say. Because the truth is everything we say has 2 sides to it. The direct face value point, and then the implications that inevitably result as a consequence from that point.

So the other thing you are saying is: There are points and times when men are deserving of physical pain.

On the whole you are saying: There are times when a person is deserving of physical pain, but not if they are female. If they are female they are exempt simply because they are female.

That is sexist and wrong, end of story. There are only 2 valid positions to have here. Either you believe regardless of sex nobody deserves pain in any context. Or again regardless of sex, sometimes physical violence against other people is necessary. Pick one, because otherwise thanks for playing but, you just simply are a loser. Not a valid alternative.

I know those participation trophies you got as a kid have conditioned you to believe everybody is a winner. But in this case you're really not.

click to expand

I'm not arguing with a narcissist.

If you believe that it's ok for a man to be able to strike a woman, you need some serious help

Posted by FknNerd

Posted by Ssuperman

Posted by LordComplexity

Posted by Ssuperman
Lol!!!! You just admitted it.

No more than you admit to being a husband abuser. Cause you know, you ARE a moral faggot. So that means you take it up the butt haaard. But, you think it's better when a man hits a man, than when a man hits a woman. Not by truth, but because you're a retarded puppet. So you have a husband beater mentality, and you beat your husband every saturday night sexually but otherwise every other day of the week you beat him abusefully. Checkmate Faggorito.

Fact is......women are more fragile.

Hell no. Go back to school.

At no point in time are they deserving of physical pain from a man.

So if Hitler was a woman? What then? Let's get real here. When listening to what someone says, it is always pertinent to listen to what they DON'T say. Because the truth is everything we say has 2 sides to it. The direct face value point, and then the implications that inevitably result as a consequence from that point.

So the other thing you are saying is: There are points and times when men are deserving of physical pain.

On the whole you are saying: There are times when a person is deserving of physical pain, but not if they are female. If they are female they are exempt simply because they are female.

That is sexist and wrong, end of story. There are only 2 valid positions to have here. Either you believe regardless of sex nobody deserves pain in any context. Or again regardless of sex, sometimes physical violence against other people is necessary. Pick one, because otherwise thanks for playing but, you just simply are a loser. Not a valid alternative.

I know those participation trophies you got as a kid have conditioned you to believe everybody is a winner. But in this case you're really not.

I'm not arguing with a narcissist.

If you believe that it's ok for a man to be able to strike a woman, you need some serious help

Libra men think they are women.

click to expand

Quote of the day

Posted by LordComplexity
But otherwise I explicitly engage a massive amount of restraint in any given situation to focus on simply physically restraining the person.

Lol gtfoh with that. You told me you were gonna rape me bloody with a knife within the first few hours of interaction. You said grosser things to others here. Self-restraint is not part of your vocabulary.

Posted by Dead_Kermit

Posted by LordComplexity

Posted by Dead_Kermit
I'm preserving that one now just in case the original gets destroyed by iconoclastic barbarians.

Aka you're a racist that needs to be shot in the head. My bad.

Sure that call for violence supports your claim of standing on higher moral grounds.

click to expand

You can't argue with an idiot

Posted by LordComplexity
So if Hitler was a woman? What then? Let's get real here.

Then she (hitler) would have married at a young age and her days would be filled with keeping the home decent for her working husband and having children. Cause it was the 1930. Let's get real here.

for whatever reason that breitbart thing won't come up on my work computer - can anyone tell me what it said in a nutshell

Posted by Impulsv

Posted by Cancan26

Posted by EvilHare
www.breibart.com/protestors_durham_monument/

This was a very interesting article... It explained everything so well.

Every. One. Should. Look. At. It.

Wtf I'm at worked n it liked me to a porn web

click to expand

🤗 I'm sorry poo... It's was supposed to be for white nationalist.... Sorry about that