Since sex got easier to get, love became hard to find. Agree or disagree?
This topic was created in the Relationships forum by Bloop on Friday, December 9, 2016 and has 27 replies.
I disagree.
Humans are animals. In animal sense, sex comes first.
Posted by cvurkoNever heard of the Internet? You could possibly meet up with a stranger girl to have sex with her right now.
When did sex become easier to get? How do you know that?
20 years ago, you would have had to wait for the weekend to go out, find a girl who is willing to talk to you and make her horny enough to take her home with you.
Posted by TheCanBullIt's not my thing but a lot of people's thingPosted by TheSagIf that is your thing though...Posted by cvurkoNever heard of the Internet? You could possibly meet up with a stranger girl to have sex with her right now.
When did sex become easier to get? How do you know that?
20 years ago, you would have had to wait for the weekend to go out, find a girl who is willing to talk to you and make her horny enough to take her home with you.
TBH there are not that many people doing this, it's a rarer personality than many suggest.click to expand
Posted by cvurkololPosted by andstillfck 'em. People were fucking like rabbits with each other in Ancient Rome. Raping was normal, having a wife at 16-17 was normal, raping your wife was normal. People were fcking like people, maybe even more than we do now. All these shit (incl my opinion) are mere speculations and you have to be an idiot to think otherwise.Posted by cvurkodon john threads
When did sex become easier to get? How do you know that?click to expand
You can't possibly compare modern times with ancient Rome. Raping would get your ass straight to prison nowadys, even sexual harassment.
Posted by cvurkoI am sure the OP never questioned a human's desire to have sex through the millenums. The way I see it she asked whether sex has become easier to get in modern times, comparing the last 10-20-30-40 years.Posted by TheSagLol, im comparing the fact that that people were having sex no matter how and i deduce that its impossible to know whether we do it more often or not (which is the actual topic). The topic isnt to reflect on whether we do it morally better or not, u see? Raping may have been as easy as tinder is today, and for sure wasnt the only way to have sexPosted by cvurkololPosted by andstillfck 'em. People were fucking like rabbits with each other in Ancient Rome. Raping was normal, having a wife at 16-17 was normal, raping your wife was normal. People were fcking like people, maybe even more than we do now. All these shit (incl my opinion) are mere speculations and you have to be an idiot to think otherwise.Posted by cvurkodon john threads
When did sex become easier to get? How do you know that?
You can't possibly compare modern times with ancient Rome. Raping would get your ass straight to prison nowadys, even sexual harassment.PEOPLE FCK. Thats the reason why you are here.
click to expand
I had to hide my last post because I went too far off topic.
Sex is now easier to separate from love. We have a culture of casual sex, hookups and friends with benefits.
I don't think that it has changed much as far as love is concerned though. There has always been one night stands, it's just more advertised now.
Sex is now easier to separate from love. We have a culture of casual sex, hookups and friends with benefits.
I don't think that it has changed much as far as love is concerned though. There has always been one night stands, it's just more advertised now.
Posted by AliensusedourbogrollSure. But we got a little off topicPosted by TheSagI thought the question was about love.Posted by cvurkoI am sure the OP never questioned a human's desire to have sex through the millenums. The way I see it she asked whether sex has become easier to get in modern times, comparing the last 10-20-30-40 years.Posted by TheSagLol, im comparing the fact that that people were having sex no matter how and i deduce that its impossible to know whether we do it more often or not (which is the actual topic). The topic isnt to reflect on whether we do it morally better or not, u see? Raping may have been as easy as tinder is today, and for sure wasnt the only way to have sexPosted by cvurkololPosted by andstillfck 'em. People were fucking like rabbits with each other in Ancient Rome. Raping was normal, having a wife at 16-17 was normal, raping your wife was normal. People were fcking like people, maybe even more than we do now. All these shit (incl my opinion) are mere speculations and you have to be an idiot to think otherwise.Posted by cvurkodon john threads
When did sex become easier to get? How do you know that?
You can't possibly compare modern times with ancient Rome. Raping would get your ass straight to prison nowadys, even sexual harassment.click to expand
Posted by cvurkoDo you really think she cares whether people fucked their brains out 2000 years ago knowing there were no to little human rights in ancient times compared to now? I don't get why you would even start debating with me whether people like to fuck as much as they did in acient times? ^^Posted by TheSagShe actually never asked that. She gave the statement that its easier today (didnt compare to a specific period of time) and asked if that "fact" has an effect on the quest to find love in our opinion.Posted by cvurkoI am sure the OP never questioned a human's desire to have sex through the millenums. The way I see it she asked whether sex has become easier to get in modern times, comparing the last 10-20-30-40 years.Posted by TheSagLol, im comparing the fact that that people were having sex no matter how and i deduce that its impossible to know whether we do it more often or not (which is the actual topic). The topic isnt to reflect on whether we do it morally better or not, u see? Raping may have been as easy as tinder is today, and for sure wasnt the only way to have sexPosted by cvurkololPosted by andstillfck 'em. People were fucking like rabbits with each other in Ancient Rome. Raping was normal, having a wife at 16-17 was normal, raping your wife was normal. People were fcking like people, maybe even more than we do now. All these shit (incl my opinion) are mere speculations and you have to be an idiot to think otherwise.Posted by cvurkodon john threads
When did sex become easier to get? How do you know that?
You can't possibly compare modern times with ancient Rome. Raping would get your ass straight to prison nowadys, even sexual harassment.
On the other hand, I think that that's not a fact but a speculation and, without having interest on its possible influence on the quest to find love, i asked why we think that the first part of the statement is true. And you know how it went from there ^^click to expand
Posted by cvurkoI would have never responded to your statement if I had known you were adressing the sex topic in general.Posted by TheSagDude, i didnt ask you specifically. you decided to respond to my question with stuff that are irrelevant and you are asking me why i started debating with you? For real? I dont know if she cares or not but IMHO the statement she gave is essential to the question she asked and, by trying to dissect it, im trying to reach a more objective (presumably) answer to her question.Posted by cvurkoDo you really think she cares whether people fucked their brains out 2000 years ago knowing there were no to little humans rights in ancient times compared to now? I don't get why you would even start debating with me whether people like to fuck as much as they did in acient times? ^^Posted by TheSagShe actually never asked that. She gave the statement that its easier today (didnt compare to a specific period of time) and asked if that "fact" has an effect on the quest to find love in our opinion.Posted by cvurkoI am sure the OP never questioned a human's desire to have sex through the millenums. The way I see it she asked whether sex has become easier to get in modern times, comparing the last 10-20-30-40 years.Posted by TheSagLol, im comparing the fact that that people were having sex no matter how and i deduce that its impossible to know whether we do it more often or not (which is the actual topic). The topic isnt to reflect on whether we do it morally better or not, u see? Raping may have been as easy as tinder is today, and for sure wasnt the only way to have sexPosted by cvurkololPosted by andstillfck 'em. People were fucking like rabbits with each other in Ancient Rome. Raping was normal, having a wife at 16-17 was normal, raping your wife was normal. People were fcking like people, maybe even more than we do now. All these shit (incl my opinion) are mere speculations and you have to be an idiot to think otherwise.Posted by cvurkodon john threads
When did sex become easier to get? How do you know that?
You can't possibly compare modern times with ancient Rome. Raping would get your ass straight to prison nowadys, even sexual harassment.
On the other hand, I think that that's not a fact but a speculation and, without having interest on its possible influence on the quest to find love, i asked why we think that the first part of the statement is true. And you know how it went from there ^^
So why dont you let her decide for herself whether or not she sees anything constructive in my question? If she doesn't, she may ignore it, which you could've done as easily.
I wont continue the debate with you thoclick to expand
I just interpret her question differently.
Posted by VirgofemThis won.
Men looking for sex. Women looking for love. Some meet in the middle and make it work. A story as old as time
Females: sex has always been easy to get. Love has always been hard to get because females use sex in place of love, so they don't put the right energy out there to find love.
Men: sex has always been hard to get, however, since millennial women have less morals, and severely lack in common sense, men can now get a lot of sex without any expectations placed on them. so, now, it is easier to get. Why should they look for love? The milk is free, and it's everywhere.
It's not a matter of love being harder to get ..... it's just not a requirement for men with these younger women. They fuck the men without any terms or conditions, so men don't HAVE to love them.
so they don't .. they take the kitty and run
why not? If women wanted love, then they would present themselves as such. If they present themselves as being available for a fwb, then that is what they will get.
Love isn't hard to find. You just have to have some integrity to get it.
Posted by BloopPosted by VirgofemThis won.
Men looking for sex. Women looking for love. Some meet in the middle and make it work. A story as old as timeclick to expand
won?
so, you had expectations on what answers you would accept?
How closed minded
Disagree...
Posted by TheSagExactly! My uncle told me in his youth him and my father were well of financially and all they could get were prostitutes and they were looking for ladies to date and have sex with but it wasn't possible because decent women were not putting out unless you married them!Posted by cvurkoNever heard of the Internet? You could possibly meet up with a stranger girl to have sex with her right now.
When did sex become easier to get? How do you know that?
20 years ago, you would have had to wait for the weekend to go out, find a girl who is willing to talk to you and make her horny enough to take her home with you.click to expand
Sexual revolution changed that completely and casual sex was born!
I don't know if anyone remember when living together was looked like a deadly sin and woman in this kind of cituation was viewed as a low class person?
Posted by P-Angel
Females: sex has always been easy to get. Love has always been hard to get because females use sex in place of love, so they don't put the right energy out there to find love.
Men: sex has always been hard to get, however, since millennial women have less morals, and severely lack in common sense, men can now get a lot of sex without any expectations placed on them. so, now, it is easier to get. Why should they look for love? The milk is free, and it's everywhere.
It's not a matter of love being harder to get ..... it's just not a requirement for men with these younger women. They fuck the men without any terms or conditions, so men don't HAVE to love them.
so they don't .. they take the kitty and run
why not? If women wanted love, then they would present themselves as such. If they present themselves as being available for a fwb, then that is what they will get.
Love isn't hard to find. You just have to have some integrity to get it.
Winner.
Posted by P-AngelThat's what I said a couple of days ago.
Females: sex has always been easy to get. Love has always been hard to get because females use sex in place of love, so they don't put the right energy out there to find love.
Men: sex has always been hard to get, however, since millennial women have less morals, and severely lack in common sense, men can now get a lot of sex without any expectations placed on them. so, now, it is easier to get. Why should they look for love? The milk is free, and it's everywhere.
It's not a matter of love being harder to get ..... it's just not a requirement for men with these younger women. They fuck the men without any terms or conditions, so men don't HAVE to love them.
so they don't .. they take the kitty and run
why not? If women wanted love, then they would present themselves as such. If they present themselves as being available for a fwb, then that is what they will get.
Love isn't hard to find. You just have to have some integrity to get it.
Men are like dogs, women are like their masters. You get what you teach.
Posted by AliensusedourbogrollI meant one. And I am pretty much well versed in English as you or any other westerner. Thank you.Posted by P-AngelNo idiot. She means 'one'. English isn't her first language. It's pretty obvious.Posted by BloopPosted by VirgofemThis won.
Men looking for sex. Women looking for love. Some meet in the middle and make it work. A story as old as time
won?
so, you had expectations on what answers you would accept?
How closed mindedclick to expand
If you're just as well versed in English as any westerner, then why did you type "won" when you meant "one"
typos don't happen like that .. a typo would be if you accidently hit the key next to it, like ...
wne or tne or wbe or wme or ont or onw or if you have your fingers on the wrong keys entirely
but to type a completely different word that sounds the same, is not a typo .. it's an error in grammar.
So, it's ok to say "ooops, I meant one" but, to say, "well versed in English as you or any other westerner" is just plain hogwash.
you can't even admit being in error .. you have to lie to save face?
You cannot even manage being a human and being in error?
typos don't happen like that .. a typo would be if you accidently hit the key next to it, like ...
wne or tne or wbe or wme or ont or onw or if you have your fingers on the wrong keys entirely
but to type a completely different word that sounds the same, is not a typo .. it's an error in grammar.
So, it's ok to say "ooops, I meant one" but, to say, "well versed in English as you or any other westerner" is just plain hogwash.
you can't even admit being in error .. you have to lie to save face?
You cannot even manage being a human and being in error?
Disagree. Sex is an important part of romantic love, and vice versa.
What made love harder to find is the advent of social media/online dating. To love someone is a choice. Why settle for the boy next door when you have the entire male population at your fingertips?
What made love harder to find is the advent of social media/online dating. To love someone is a choice. Why settle for the boy next door when you have the entire male population at your fingertips?
Posted by Blooptotally !
I disagree.
Feels like TRUE, that's why I am avoiding SEX for True Love
Disagree. I don't believe it increased nor decreased. Nor do I believe love became difficult to find. I believe they have both become more accessible via socal media outlets. If you think back before social media became rampant, the intent of sex and love still existed. It was just time consuming because in order to get to know someone's wants and desires you needed to invest time with that person before it became known. However, technology has allowed one to literally skim through a person's wants and desires via their profiles without investing ample time. So while it may seem as if there are many profiles to sift through, time has been dramatically reduced simultaneously. One is an exchange for the other.
Speak for yourself, sex is infinitely hard to get....love is SO EASY...
Some women have no boundaries, are scared to ask for and get what they want so enter into the ridiculous arrangement of FWB hoping the man will start to feel deeply for her and then love her...
....of course that rarely happens
Sex is as easy to get as walking into a shop and buying a chocolate bar
Love isn't
Raising your standards is the key
*~*~*~*
....of course that rarely happens
Sex is as easy to get as walking into a shop and buying a chocolate bar
Love isn't
Raising your standards is the key
*~*~*~*
Both are easy or hard... depends on where you stand and how you see it all.
As for me, both are easy to find..
I needn't explain about sex being easy
As for love, IDK.. I believe there's love in everyone/in all animals/plants/everything.
Firstly, I would like to ask, how can we think that what we see - that is, our perception of what is, is the only truth?
I am strong believer that all people have love in their hearts - everyone. I trust this.
I don't agree that love is in only those persons, when they express it actively, in ways that is perceivable or rather palatable to us - in our limited senses/perceptions. It is in everyone.
As for me, both are easy to find..
I needn't explain about sex being easy
As for love, IDK.. I believe there's love in everyone/in all animals/plants/everything.
Firstly, I would like to ask, how can we think that what we see - that is, our perception of what is, is the only truth?
I am strong believer that all people have love in their hearts - everyone. I trust this.
I don't agree that love is in only those persons, when they express it actively, in ways that is perceivable or rather palatable to us - in our limited senses/perceptions. It is in everyone.
Posted by P-AngelIt's called a brain typo....you think "one" but the phoenetical twin "won" comes to mind in that fraction of a second....
If you're just as well versed in English as any westerner, then why did you type "won" when you meant "one"
typos don't happen like that .. a typo would be if you accidently hit the key next to it, like ...
wne or tne or wbe or wme or ont or onw or if you have your fingers on the wrong keys entirely
but to type a completely different word that sounds the same, is not a typo .. it's an error in grammar.
So, it's ok to say "ooops, I meant one" but, to say, "well versed in English as you or any other westerner" is just plain hogwash.
you can't even admit being in error .. you have to lie to save face?
You cannot even manage being a human and being in error?
Leave Your Feedback
We'd love to hear your thoughts! If you're not logged in, you can still share your feedback below. Your input helps us improve the experience for everyone. To post your own content or join the conversation, please log in or create an account.
Related Topics
http://www.mermaid-uk.net/Esotericearth.htm
You know Sagittarius is ruled by another planet other then Jupiter. Esoterically speaking is Earth. However in the chart, Earth is the centerpoint. But none the less it is still a planet and it rules Sagit
@Vulcansfire
Joined: Sep 19, 2016 · Topics: 19 · Posts: 529
What is your turning point?
@raad182
Joined: Sep 05, 2016 · Topics: 592 · Posts: 2993
Have a sit and drink our fine nectar.
@Aquistorm
Joined: Dec 20, 2015 · Topics: 95 · Posts: 1721
It's about that time again where I start spiralling and now is around that time.
I fucking hate life, why am I who I am? Why does it have to be like this? I've spent all afternoon watching plastic surgery videos on YouTube wondering how the fuck people a
@The_eleventh_sign_11
Joined: Oct 08, 2009 · Topics: 313 · Posts: 6313
If you could change you sun sign for one week and live that week feeling all that sign would feel, which sign would you choose and why?
I'd like to try being a Sag for a week, to experience all that optimism, all those opinions I'd believe are importan
@Season
Joined: Dec 11, 2015 · Topics: 107 · Posts: 2521
Okay this is quite long, but I hope you will read it to the end.
I'm a bisexual Gemini woman.I've known this Virgo woman for three years and liked her for two years now.She did not give me any hints or whatsoever last year.I tried to forget about since m
@DomesticLawnmower
Joined: Dec 09, 2016 · Topics: 2 · Posts: 14
Hi everybody, I just want to ask if there's any difference in character between a sag not born on the cusp and a sag born on the cusp. Actually I just read about cusp signs, and I am a sag/cap cusper. I'm a bit new here I'll appreciate if anyone can tell
@Gabzy
Joined: Nov 18, 2016 · Topics: 3 · Posts: 38
My venus and mars is in capricorn, and his venus is in scorpio, I've read that venus in scorpio are crazy and I should run for the hills? I can say we are very intense with each other but what else should I look out for or how to deal with a venus and sco
@Saggie1220
Joined: Dec 09, 2016 · Topics: 6 · Posts: 50
Ok guys I been holding this in for a while, i've been in this site stalking, I mean reading but now I am ready to express. TL;DR Im in A relationship for past 18months with A Girl that used to Be Sweet, she is kinda manipulating but i really did not mind
@Kodak
Joined: Sep 18, 2016 · Topics: 20 · Posts: 584
I am the real Peter Griffin. Hehehehe.
https://s16.postimg.org/l3kxyvl7p/graphic.png
@Kodak
Joined: Sep 18, 2016 · Topics: 20 · Posts: 584