Signed Up:
Sep 08, 2010Comments: 0 · Posts: 113 · Topics: 11
Whewww... that's a relief to hear. Thanks for enlightening, Lilith!
Signed Up:
Sep 08, 2010Comments: 0 · Posts: 113 · Topics: 11
Have you guys seen the new zodiac signs? Gemini now begins on June 22 up to July 20. This is crazy. I have always been a "highly complex gem" and now I'm a taurus. Not so far off because I have a taurus moon but this has me all confused. What do you guys think of the new zodiac signs?
Check out YOUR Zodiac Sign with the New Zodiac Signs 2011 or just look below.
Capricorn: Jan. 20-Feb. 16.
Aquarius: Feb. 16-March 11.
Pisces: March 11-April 18.
Aries: April 18-May 13.
...Taurus: May 13-June 21.
Gemini: June 21-July 20.
Cancer: July 20-Aug. 10.
Leo: Aug. 10-Sept. 16.
Virgo: Sept. 16-Oct. 30.
Libra: Oct. 30-Nov. 23.
Scorpio: Nov. 23-29.
Ophiuchus:* Nov. 29-Dec. 17.
Sagittarius: Dec. 17-Jan. 20.
Signed Up:
Sep 08, 2010Comments: 0 · Posts: 113 · Topics: 11
Well, I was hoping to hear from the resident psychics or those who've had the same experience.
I did consult my long time psychic friend about this (she became my friend later on) and what she did say is that they can't edit what they see, so they have to tell it like they see it, but she did spot the conflict of interest and said that this could be avoided by recusing themselves from the reading.
That kind of makes sense. If they already take someone in for a reading, then they can't edit so their free will to balance the conflict of interest comes in before accepting the much later client.
Signed Up:
Sep 08, 2010Comments: 0 · Posts: 113 · Topics: 11
This is kind of bothering me. I had been going to a psychic because I needed advice on how to deal with certain people I was feuding with and then, I find out later on that she's also advising the very same people that I'm asking her advice on.
It bothers me because of the inherent conflict of interest involved. I mean, in my profession, when you have a client, you can't also take as a client the person opposing your client. It's just not done for ethical reasons.
I mean, do I have this all wrong? I know that being a psychic isn't regulated by a bar or board but for those who are in the business, is it whoever pays?
Signed Up:
Sep 08, 2010Comments: 0 · Posts: 113 · Topics: 11
Oh, and to add a Virgo perspective on this -- remember I was with Virguy? He used to get so pissed whenever I'd talk to other guys and be friendly. For him, he knows that the other guys think I'm interested in them. For me, I was just being pleasant and friendly and, since I was with him, definitely knew I wasn't interested in them. The presumption (with Gems at least) is that they're just chatting me up; they haven't said/done anything to indicate otherwise so it's harmless.
My point being unless you push it up a notch with the Gem, you'll never know why she's talking to you or if she's truly interested. That's what makes us simple (if you ask) and complicated (if you don't ask but just analyze) at the same time.
Signed Up:
Sep 08, 2010Comments: 0 · Posts: 113 · Topics: 11
Hi Cajunspirit! I've been thinking about your post. You say it's easy to approach gem girls but you hit a wall because you're mostly a listener and you want to know if she's interested or not.
It's true that we're easy to approach. You seem to have that down pat.
The thing you have to understand with Gem girls is that since we're naturally friendly and can relate easy with anybody is that everybody starts out on equal footing. Everyone is a potential friend until they give us signs that they're interested in that way. That's when our brain shifts gears and starts to consider and see you in a different light.
If we don't get those signals, conversation goes on simply because we like talking to different kinds of people. You talk. I talk. You don't talk. Maybe I still talk or maybe I don't. If I see that there is nothing to be "negotiated" further, I move on to others I can converse with.
Whenever you hit that wall, it's just a case of two observers observing each other. We kind of have to know what we're dealing with so we know how to position ourselves. She's waiting for more data from you. That's why sometimes the direct but light approach with us works best but you have got to express your interest in a more overt manner (but keep it light at first!! emphasis on this). If she's a gem, she's going to flirt back but you still won't know what it is for sure unless you press on but at least she knows that you're in business.
Signed Up:
Sep 08, 2010Comments: 0 · Posts: 113 · Topics: 11
Hmmm... I don't know what you intend to achieve with this letter but if you want to keep the doors open for further communication or even him coming back, I'd suggest you leave out the i'm letting you go part.
I mean, if you want and feel the need to let go for your own sanity, go ahead and let go but no need to announce it to him. The letter reads to me like an ultimatum. IOW, it comes across as -- if you don't respond to this now, i'm going to let go.
I've gotten these types of letters before and even though I was really very close to getting back to getting it on again with them (yeah, bad timing on the letter sender's part. Their impatience didn't serve them well.) I changed my mind as soon as I got the letter even though it had the I still want you undertones because I felt like I was being railroaded into making a decision.
IDK if it will be the same for your Gem but let me tell you this -- we're big believers in self-autonomy and if you have decided for yourself that you will be letting go, then that's that. We will respect your decision.
OTOH, just being friendly in your letters or even not writing at all = OPEN DOOR. If by the time that he's ready and he knocks on your door, you're not available, he'll take it like a man and suck it up as part of the risk he took in keeping silent. But if you send that type of letter now, I'm not sure you will know if he'd want to come back at all or get the response you want even.
Just my two cents on this.