Astrology and Science
Posted by 7times77Actually it's not correct if you say "vedic sign" because long before astrology was transmitted to India in the 4th century BC, the Sumerian has revealed the image of the constellations. In modern times, the zodiac is known as the "sidereal zodiac".Posted by NechepsoYou're very interesting. I hope you keep speaking about many more topics on classical astrology.
I am very ashamed of the current state of astrology! Why were so many ignorant people fatally accepting what Ptolemy had revealed in his book "Tetrabiblos"?
He did not intend to make the nature of the Zodiac in the constellation imposed on the season on earth! In other words, he did not use the equinox in the nature of the Zodiac because his initial purpose was that he wanted to form a pattern of seasons with respect to the rotation of the earth around a single star in our solar system or also known as the sun. In short, he does not use the elements of air, fire, earth, and water in astology because of the pattern of seasons. These elements are all for the sake of the seasons that occur on earth. I am not an Indian, but you should all be embarrassed because they are the ones who use the Zodiac that should be used in Astrology. March 21st to April 21st is Aries. This is all the nonsense in Astrology!
I want to challenge all of you here. Can anyone explain how astrology works in your life empirically?
It makes more sense to base the signs on the constellations (fixed stars) than on seasons or the tropical system, but personally, I can't relate to my Vedic signs and many are the same. I guess this is why there are contemporary astrologers who use the tropical system but reads and interprets using Vedic astrology. Examples: Ryan Kurczak, Vic DiCaraclick to expand
Then, astronomy/astrology was perfected by the ancient Egyptians by counting exactly 12 hours during the day and 12 hours at night for a total of 24 hours in one day. This all shows the luminary displacement by 1 degree in the respect position of constellation. That measurement is what we know with so-called "hour" today. More precisely in astrology, predictions that occur in nativitiem, mundane, or chart of events have been compiled by the King of Egypt, Nechepso and his priest, Petosiris. All of this inspired people in the Hellenistic era to make a tool known as Oroskopio/Horoscope [ωροσκόπιο] which means the hour marker.
In my opinion, scientists won't dissin astrology by using the sidereal zodiac because ironically NASA and astronomers to date still owe the ancient knowledge on how the universe works. Keep in mind that astrology itself isn't psychology, so this is not used to read about our personality. It's all about predictions and forecasting in it's veracious definitions.
Btw, I really appriciate your positive feedback.
James Braha is the best western vedic astrologer imo.
Change History
Posted by 7times77Actually it's not correct if you say "vedic sign" because long before astrology was transmitted to India in the 4th century BC, the Sumerian has revealed the image of the constellations. In modern times, the zodiac is known as the "sidereal zodiac".Posted by NechepsoYou're very interesting. I hope you keep speaking about many more topics on classical astrology.
I am very ashamed of the current state of astrology! Why were so many ignorant people fatally accepting what Ptolemy had revealed in his book "Tetrabiblos"?
He did not intend to make the nature of the Zodiac in the constellation imposed on the season on earth! In other words, he did not use the equinox in the nature of the Zodiac because his initial purpose was that he wanted to form a pattern of seasons with respect to the rotation of the earth around a single star in our solar system or also known as the sun. In short, he does not use the elements of air, fire, earth, and water in astology because of the pattern of seasons. These elements are all for the sake of the seasons that occur on earth. I am not an Indian, but you should all be embarrassed because they are the ones who use the Zodiac that should be used in Astrology. March 21st to April 21st is Aries. This is all the nonsense in Astrology!
I want to challenge all of you here. Can anyone explain how astrology works in your life empirically?
It makes more sense to base the signs on the constellations (fixed stars) than on seasons or the tropical system, but personally, I can't relate to my Vedic signs and many are the same. I guess this is why there are contemporary astrologers who use the tropical system but reads and interprets using Vedic astrology. Examples: Ryan Kurczak, Vic DiCaraclick to expand
Then, astronomy/astrology was perfected by the ancient Egyptians by counting exactly 12 hours during the day and 12 hours at night for a total of 24 hours in one day. This all shows the luminary displacement of 1 degree to the constellation. That measurement is what we know with so-called "hour" today. More precisely in astrology, predictions that occur in nativitiem, mundane, or chart of events have been compiled by the King of Egypt, Nechepso and his priest, Petosiris. All of this inspired people in the Hellenistic era to make a tool known as Oroskopio/Horoscope [?????????] which means the hour marker.
In my opinion, scientists won't dissin astrology by using the sidereal zodiac because ironically NASA and astronomers to date still owe the ancient knowledge on how the universe works. Keep in mind that astrology itself isn't psychology, so this is not used to read about our personality. It's all about predictions and forecasting in it's veracious definitions.
Posted by 7times77Actually it's not correct if you say "vedic sign" because long before astrology was transmitted to India in the 4th century BC, the Sumerian has revealed the image of the constellations. In modern times, the zodiac is known as the "sidereal zodiac".Posted by NechepsoYou're very interesting. I hope you keep speaking about many more topics on classical astrology.
I am very ashamed of the current state of astrology! Why were so many ignorant people fatally accepting what Ptolemy had revealed in his book "Tetrabiblos"?
He did not intend to make the nature of the Zodiac in the constellation imposed on the season on earth! In other words, he did not use the equinox in the nature of the Zodiac because his initial purpose was that he wanted to form a pattern of seasons with respect to the rotation of the earth around a single star in our solar system or also known as the sun. In short, he does not use the elements of air, fire, earth, and water in astology because of the pattern of seasons. These elements are all for the sake of the seasons that occur on earth. I am not an Indian, but you should all be embarrassed because they are the ones who use the Zodiac that should be used in Astrology. March 21st to April 21st is Aries. This is all the nonsense in Astrology!
I want to challenge all of you here. Can anyone explain how astrology works in your life empirically?
It makes more sense to base the signs on the constellations (fixed stars) than on seasons or the tropical system, but personally, I can't relate to my Vedic signs and many are the same. I guess this is why there are contemporary astrologers who use the tropical system but reads and interprets using Vedic astrology. Examples: Ryan Kurczak, Vic DiCaraclick to expand
Then, astronomy/astrology was perfected by the ancient Egyptians by counting exactly 12 hours during the day and 12 hours at night for a total of 24 hours in one day. This all shows the luminary displacement of 1 degree to the constellation. That measurement is what we know with so-called "hour" today. More precisely in astrology, predictions that occur in nativitiem, mundane, or chart of events have been compiled by the King of Egypt, Nechepso and his priest, Petosiris. All of this inspired people in the Hellenistic era to make a tool known as Oroskopio/Horoscope [?????????] which means the hour marker.
In my opinion, scientists won't dissin astrology by using the sidereal zodiac because ironically NASA and astronomers to date still owe the ancient knowledge on how the universe works. Keep in mind that astrology itself isn't psychology, so this is not used to read about our personality. It's all about predictions and forecasting in it's veracious definitions.
Btw, I really appriciate your positive feedback.
Posted by 7times77Actually it's not correct if you say "vedic sign" because long before astrology was transmitted to India in the 4th century BC, the Sumerian has revealed the image of the constellations. In modern times, the zodiac is known as the "sidereal zodiac".Posted by NechepsoYou're very interesting. I hope you keep speaking about many more topics on classical astrology.
I am very ashamed of the current state of astrology! Why were so many ignorant people fatally accepting what Ptolemy had revealed in his book "Tetrabiblos"?
He did not intend to make the nature of the Zodiac in the constellation imposed on the season on earth! In other words, he did not use the equinox in the nature of the Zodiac because his initial purpose was that he wanted to form a pattern of seasons with respect to the rotation of the earth around a single star in our solar system or also known as the sun. In short, he does not use the elements of air, fire, earth, and water in astology because of the pattern of seasons. These elements are all for the sake of the seasons that occur on earth. I am not an Indian, but you should all be embarrassed because they are the ones who use the Zodiac that should be used in Astrology. March 21st to April 21st is Aries. This is all the nonsense in Astrology!
I want to challenge all of you here. Can anyone explain how astrology works in your life empirically?
It makes more sense to base the signs on the constellations (fixed stars) than on seasons or the tropical system, but personally, I can't relate to my Vedic signs and many are the same. I guess this is why there are contemporary astrologers who use the tropical system but reads and interprets using Vedic astrology. Examples: Ryan Kurczak, Vic DiCaraclick to expand
Then, astronomy/astrology was perfected by the ancient Egyptians by counting exactly 12 hours during the day and 12 hours at night for a total of 24 hours in one day. This all shows the luminary displacement by 1 degree to the constellation. That measurement is what we know with so-called "hour" today. More precisely in astrology, predictions that occur in nativitiem, mundane, or chart of events have been compiled by the King of Egypt, Nechepso and his priest, Petosiris. All of this inspired people in the Hellenistic era to make a tool known as Oroskopio/Horoscope [?????????] which means the hour marker.
In my opinion, scientists won't dissin astrology by using the sidereal zodiac because ironically NASA and astronomers to date still owe the ancient knowledge on how the universe works. Keep in mind that astrology itself isn't psychology, so this is not used to read about our personality. It's all about predictions and forecasting in it's veracious definitions.
Btw, I really appriciate your positive feedback.
Posted by 7times77Actually it's not correct if you say "vedic sign" because long before astrology was transmitted to India in the 4th century BC, the Sumerian has revealed the image of the constellations. In modern times, the zodiac is known as the "sidereal zodiac".Posted by NechepsoYou're very interesting. I hope you keep speaking about many more topics on classical astrology.
I am very ashamed of the current state of astrology! Why were so many ignorant people fatally accepting what Ptolemy had revealed in his book "Tetrabiblos"?
He did not intend to make the nature of the Zodiac in the constellation imposed on the season on earth! In other words, he did not use the equinox in the nature of the Zodiac because his initial purpose was that he wanted to form a pattern of seasons with respect to the rotation of the earth around a single star in our solar system or also known as the sun. In short, he does not use the elements of air, fire, earth, and water in astology because of the pattern of seasons. These elements are all for the sake of the seasons that occur on earth. I am not an Indian, but you should all be embarrassed because they are the ones who use the Zodiac that should be used in Astrology. March 21st to April 21st is Aries. This is all the nonsense in Astrology!
I want to challenge all of you here. Can anyone explain how astrology works in your life empirically?
It makes more sense to base the signs on the constellations (fixed stars) than on seasons or the tropical system, but personally, I can't relate to my Vedic signs and many are the same. I guess this is why there are contemporary astrologers who use the tropical system but reads and interprets using Vedic astrology. Examples: Ryan Kurczak, Vic DiCaraclick to expand
Then, astronomy/astrology was perfected by the ancient Egyptians by counting exactly 12 hours during the day and 12 hours at night for a total of 24 hours in one day. This all shows the luminary displacement by 1 degree in the respect position of constellation. That measurement is what we know with so-called "hour" today. More precisely in astrology, predictions that occur in nativitiem, mundane, or chart of events have been compiled by the King of Egypt, Nechepso and his priest, Petosiris. All of this inspired people in the Hellenistic era to make a tool known as Oroskopio/Horoscope [?????????] which means the hour marker.
In my opinion, scientists won't dissin astrology by using the sidereal zodiac because ironically NASA and astronomers to date still owe the ancient knowledge on how the universe works. Keep in mind that astrology itself isn't psychology, so this is not used to read about our personality. It's all about predictions and forecasting in it's veracious definitions.
Btw, I really appriciate your positive feedback.