Tea on Jada, Will, August
Posted by virgoOPPPI thought I was better with feminine moon but I think I like masculine moon betterPosted by ELIGABPosted by virgoOPPPPosted by ELIGABPosted by virgoOPPPPosted by ELIGABPosted by virgoOPPPPosted by ELIGABPosted by virgoOPPPPosted by stillstillwater
Sooooo after talking to the Libra and some other friends etc I now see that she cheated.... Because they asked for space to work on themselves not to date other people.
Do you guys think it was miscommunication or she knew that it would be considered cheating and did it anyways??
Because if it's the second, she's not sorry at all.
i've noticed that a bunch of famous women in open marriages are virgo. imo it's probably coz of the ability to detach. personally, if someone i care for thinks this is something they need (and it's a union i can't leave for.... reasons). i'd probably do my best to detach the way she did. and with that double virgo/airy chart, i don't doubt she'd have trouble doing it too. she'd be capable of cold, hard reasoning that doesn't always accommodate sentimentalities.
it's for self-preservation... and well, isn't this what you wanted?
Me and my ex scorpio sun/scorpio moon had a very similar relationship...
Until I decided to walk away.....
Truly believe scorpio moon needs a judgement-free zone because they really have alot of secrets
ALOT
my problem with scorpio suns or scorpio moons
them: "how DARE you lie about your fave color?"
me: "i don't even know your fake fave color."
you can't expect anything of value when you've barely shelled out anything yourself
It's quite boring honestly
When a scorpio is not shelling things out, they usually have alot to hide
In my experience
we do better with people who are more openly emotional, less restrained
mirroring
Say that again...
My boyfriend have fire placements and I'm never confused lol....
🤣🤗
i'm in the most emotionally-packed relationship. and it's working great. why is that? coz the cap sun/pisces moon never makes me feel ashamed for expressing my feelings. i receive no punishment when i cry or admit to being hurt. but if he'd been cold to me or insulted me at times when i lose control of my emotions, then i'd have been more restrained. and i'd probably turn out to be as cold as jada.
gotta say she has the coldest eyes like they're pretty but brrrrr.
In general
Do you think you're better with feminine moon signs?
i guessclick to expand
But then again, I'm always changing my confused mind
😆🤫🤔🤔🧐
Leave Your Feedback
We'd love to hear your thoughts! If you're not logged in, you can still share your feedback below. Your input helps us improve the experience for everyone. To post your own content or join the conversation, please log in or create an account.
Related Messages
Posted by xy_sighPosted by CuddleBug1288Posted by xy_sighPosted by CuddleBug1288
1- I've been in a car accident
2- As a teenager I was brought home by the police twice
3- I've been pregnant
2?
As the truth? I'm assuming that's what you mean?
Yesclick to expand
Dang, was gonna wait n see if anyone else has guesses but I'm impatient.
Yup, that's the truth lol. Ages 12 and 16 🤷🏻♀️😬
Posted by TinnedglassPosted by Soul
Sounds like it's a lighter way of your work laying you off.
Truth is you probably have nothing at all.
Haha not at all buddy. I am the CFO, so actually it means more work for me, they are sending me a lot of hard drives to munch on this quarantine days, sucks. Well i was present when the test showed positive, i don't know how is it that i may have nothing at all hahaha. 🤷♂️click to expand
I could name some crazy ways. Anyway only .04% of people die from it, so your chances are pretty good. Then again the source I got that from might be as skewed as the original number of cases the media released, which was proven to be completely off and much less. It makes me wonder if the kits world governments are sending to doctors are actually accurate, or purposely test positive for numbers. They would do that for political strength. Everyone knows everything medical related goes through the government first right?
Who am I kidding? The government would never do that, and we all should fully trust the government. They would never try to hurt their people.
Posted by xy_sighPosted by CuddleBug1288Posted by xy_sighPosted by CuddleBug1288Posted by xy_sighPosted by CuddleBug1288
1- I've been in a car accident
2- As a teenager I was brought home by the police twice
3- I've been pregnant
2?
As the truth? I'm assuming that's what you mean?
Yes
Dang, was gonna wait n see if anyone else has guesses but I'm impatient.
Yup, that's the truth lol. Ages 12 and 16 🤷🏻♀️😬
Oh damn. Stories?click to expand
Lol. Shoplifting at 12...underage drinking at 16. I have stories for those but that's all I'll say 😁🤫😎
Posted by Scenic
During the IAT you just completed:
Your responses suggested no automatic preference between Black people and White people.
Not sure what I was expecting, but this result fits my generally neutral attitude towards life.
I think the fact that you did it knowing the variables that were possible but still remained open-minded enough that you accepted the possibility of all of those variables only further solidifies the fact that you had no automatic preference; too. 🙃
Thanks for taking the time to share your results as well. I wasn't sure if anybody was going to brave the test let alone brave posting their results, so that was pretty cool of ya'.
1- I've showered with a random bartender
2- I've been paid for sex
3- I've had sex in front of other people
2- I've been paid for sex
3- I've had sex in front of other people
Posted by WarAngelHow quickly you do it is actually one of those factored components for this test, so that kind of depends on you.
If this is going to take a while, I'll do it later.
I think a high estimate of how long it would take is no more than 10 minutes if that helps you determine if/when you may choose to take it.
Posted by _DazedPosted by nevesPosted by _Dazed
@neves
Those comments under the YouTube video are the epitome of an echo chamber. That's evident based on the huge increase in views/subscribers to his channel after posting that video.
I'm willing to bet that a large majority of his subscribers, especially those 100k+ that subscribed in the days following this video, are white conservatives.
Did you check the video (the 2nd one)?! I would agree with you if that guy is spilling a lot of bullshit - might even be the one debunking it (as i did in the past - with other BS posted on DXP) - but that dude makes a lot strong points. Thus, you'd loose that bet for sure - because his ideas are anything but conservative (radical even). Not only that, he's saying stuff "that most white people can't/won't in U.S. (since it's deemed as politically incorrect - aka, that could get you fired - as it happened in the past)". Which, is quite ironic... to be called privileged (which implies - you have more rights) - while your freedom of speech is limited - for being white (if your skin has any other color - those limits don't apply). And i don't mean racist shit, but general truths tackled with common sense (or why not - inconvenient truths). Only a black person could approach those subjects - without getting intro trouble.
One could say, the roles have reversed. I mean, in the American past - some white people used to be black people's voice (and those inconvenient truths - didn't sit well with a lot white people - for obvious reasons). And now - white people need black people to be their voice - while touching certain subjects that are deemed taboo (politically incorrect). Sure, there are some white people - who don't have anything to risk (work from home or have their own business) - who approached those subjects on YouTube (or some other social network). But it's not the same, as in - those people have only white viewers (black people wouldn't bother checking his content - they'd just read the title - label him as racist and move on). On the others hand, if a black dude voices those things - then the black audience - might give him a chance to speak his mind (even if initially they'd think he's just trolling, while hearing him out - those truths can change some of their views - could even change their life for better). If anything, the title is misleading (click bait - if you will), and he's to blunt/direct at times.
That being said, his rise in views and subscribers - could actually be legit (an eye opener for some and a voice for others). One last thing... i'm actually kinda shocked that this came from someone like him, as in... both a religious person and a Trump supporter (i have to admit, i had all kinds of prejudice - when it comes to Trump supporters - as if i could never ever see eye to eye with one of them, yet... life can be surprising like that).
You're using quite a bit of anecdotal evidence to support your claims, so I shall do the same..
I have a WIDE range of political and cultural acquaintances/friends on my social media. I've not seen one person of color post videos like this, be it ABL, Candace Owens, Officer Tatum, etc. The only folks that have posted them (and I'm assuming watching and agreeing) are white conservatives.click to expand
It’s so cringe
Posted by IxiPosted by bmoon8Posted by IxiPosted by BoredToDeathPosted by IxiPosted by BoredToDeathPosted by IxiPosted by _DazedPosted by BoredToDeathPosted by _DazedPosted by BoredToDeathPosted by WitchmitchAries
Would if these White people are Jews? They earned everything they have.
holocaust survivor
The left is becoming more and more overtly anti-semetic everyday so this accusation doesn't even really hope any weight anymore lmao, a lot don't even try to hide it. Sure there's anti-semetic neonazis on the right as well, the difference is that it's relegated to the fringes while it's crept into the mainstream on the left. They just see them as a sub-sect of economically privileged people who also benefit from their light skinned white privilege. The people on the left who obsess over Israeli human rights violations give a free pass to other middle east countries and bend over backwards defending them as long as they're browner and Muslim
I wasn't aware that the issue regarding the West bank was related to race.
Ok
I'm serious. I don't know much about the stuff. I thought it was all religion based and I don't follow anything much regarding religion.
There is a racial component, but to be frank the issue with Israel is apartheid and their "internal" security apparatus as well as the direction and policy of the Netanyahu gov't.
Pro-Israel folks want to focus on the actions of Iranian backed actors but often times ignore the policies that Israel has towards Palestinians both in the Gaza Strip and Africans living within the country.
Israel is not blameless.
There's not a country on earth that's blameless
You say that as if its a defense to anything. It is not.
Except I'm not saying it as a defense. My point that I've already made is the people on the left who single out Israel while turning a blind eye to the rest of the world as it suits their agenda. Just as the religious right in America does in defense of Israel. Neither are right. I haven't defended anything Israel has done or said they're beyond criticism. Because no country and no government is. That's my point
Israel isn't singled out. If anything Israel is considered along with every other nation that oppresses people of color: The United States, The United Kingdom, France, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil...the list definitely goes on.... BLM is a global movement because Anti-Blackness is global. The West's racist and colonial legacy is global....the system infrastructure and conditioning supporting the system was as well...Israel isn't beyond reproach in this regard and that is why Israel gets its rightful scrutiny.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-mazzig-mizrahi-jews-israel-20190520-story.html% 3f_amp=true
Not reading it.click to expand
Broken link, doesn’t work anyways
Signed Up: Feb 12, 2020
Comments: 736 · Posts: 1351 · Topics: 11
Comments: 736 · Posts: 1351 · Topics: 11
Posted by _DazedPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by _DazedPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by _DazedPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by _DazedPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by _DazedPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by _Dazed
You forgot this part..
"Also, while the United States is not a fascist country, it does have fascist roots and a conservative party that uses fascist technique to corral it's base. Were it not for a constitution that separates and checks branches of government, Fascism could have easily taken hold in the US."
I didn't forget it, I figured I addressed how the fascism is irrelevant to my argument and quoted the part that covers it as not to confuse what Im addressing.
And you can say that about any democracy on this planet. "Were it not for this constitution/piece of paper/whathaveyou facism could easily have set its root" .
I'd argue that the Democrats and the leftist media as wind in the sail with the fake news, fear-mongering and race baiting of present day, is a more urgent threat to democratic values and the black communities than fascism.
News, fearmongering, etc.. are opinions that one can choose to believe or ignore.
I understand that you may not follow politics in the US as closely as I do, but my concern is at the judicial level where laws are interpreted. Judicial appointments are being made in record time under Trump and being filled by those with ideals based in nationalist and fascist beliefs. Laws and supreme court decisions that effect real lives.. not talking head media outlets I can turn off. Our courts are not the place for far-right ideologies. Judges are supposed to be impartial, middle of the road.
I've stated here many times before that I don't watch too much news media. Most of my days are spent watching CSPAN to witness with my own eyes the testimony in judiciary committees and US Supreme Court rulings. What I'm seeing is a far bigger threat than any protest could be.
What fascist beliefs, exactly? Hasn't the type of fascism you're talking about always been present in domestic US politics, and sort of accepted by the public? What's new now? That Republicans are in office and not the Democrats?
"News, fearmongering, etc.. are opinions that one can choose to believe or ignore."
So you acknowledge that news are basically opinions at this point? And which side owns most of the media space in the US? The president doesn't sway public opinion, mainstream media does and the way things are going that's a far greater threat to democracy and free speech than Trump.
What about liberal fascism, shut-down culture and the war on free speech in universities around the country and in the media?
And you're telling me a couple of MAGA hats on the far right who no one even takes seriously is what's wrong with America today?
So, no... you cannot just choose to shut off and pretend it isn't there, " believe or ignore". If the alt.right was the mainstream narrative in the media climate I could tell you the same, "shut off and ignore it". Could you?
Completely ignoring where my fear resides.. the Judicial branch of government in the US (where impartiality should reign supreme) , and instead focus on the media (which I've stated I don't watch much of).
It doesn't matter that YOU don't watch media. The rest of the population does. Public opinion is not dictated by the White House, it hasn't been for a single day during the Trump administration.
And if you don't watch the media, if not necesserily for the content and the honesty, but for how things are spun, then you can't possibly have the full picture.
I tried unwinding from it all.. but unless you're gonna live without internet in the outskirts of society somewhere there's no avoiding having contrieved narrative of of the progressive left shoved down your throat.
We simply disagree about where the real power lies. Trump is not forever.
You don't understand what the branches of government in the US are or how they work, do you? Is that why you're avoiding that aspect and why media isn't my concern?
I understand in the broadest sense, it's been like 20 years since we covered US government, but I get the three branches of gov. and their basic function, I understand how you apply fascism to your argument in that sense .. it's just that I don't see the potential for long-term damage there, not in today's political climate. Unless him & his policies can somehow stay relevant forever. And they can't.
His [Trump] policies can't, but Supreme Court [Judicial Branch] decisions can. Would you like me to expand on that?
Ok so a policy that any president leaves behind is simply stuck forever regardless if it's considered to do more harm than good in the future? That doesn't sound right.. but sure educate me.
I'm not sure where you're getting confused. An administration's policy isn't set in stone, BUT if the administration [exectutive branch] signs something into law, the Legislative branch [supreme court] can rule on that law, thereby making those "policies" last for a very long time.
Examples of policies that helped create laws, and were upheld by Supreme Court rulings, were segregation laws in the mid to late 1800's. Racial segregation policies and laws were enacted by Democrat administrations and upheld in Supreme Courts rulings like Dred Scott v. Sandford (American citizenship for black people), which took Constitutional amendments under the newly elected Republican President Grant to be overruled, and Plessy v. Ferguson (separate but equal) under Democrat President Cleveland, which lasted half a century until Brown v. Board of Education during the start of the Civil Rights movement.
If you want to read up more on Supreme Court rulings and their effects on the US, here is a list you can look through.
#massachusetts-v-environmental-protection-agency-2007-41" data-url="https://www.businessinsider.com/landmark-us-supreme-court-cases-2019-8#massachusetts-v-environmental-protection-agency-2007-41" target="_blank">https://www.businessinsider.com/landmark-us-supreme-court-cases-2019-8#massachusetts-v-environmental-protection-agency-2007-41
These rulings can last years, decades, centuries.. and effect the everyday lives of citizens in the US. They can't be ignored, whereas media opinions can. You keep focusing on the media like it matters. Left or Right opinions don't matter unless they are sitting at the bench of a Supreme Court, ruling on the laws of the land.
I'm not sure if it's your focus on the media, or lack of understanding regarding the US government, that is causing the confusion.click to expand
Alright, will read/polish up on it.
As for why I focus on media, I'd rather have one idiot at the helm of a sensible population, than a whole population of idiots further fueled by a neverending buzz of fake news and phony agendas.
I may be able to turn off the buzz for myself, but the world I live in is still populated by emotional cops (as was that case in Sweden) who drop to their knees when public servants are not suppose to affiliate politically or participate in political demonstrations while on duty. I find that problematic. We don't even have the same problems with cops and segregation as the US does, but we like to pretend that we do for some reason. That too is problematic.
Remember when that abortion thing was in height of fashion a year ago or less, the media and the political climate over here was littered with fear mongering as if it was some law that would potentially be passed here aswell.
So my reality revolves more around issues of how the public opinion is swayed by morons and the rational thinking or the lack therof, among the floor people and what kind of damage that may potentially cause. While your reality and concerns are closer linked to what's going on in Washington since duh you live in the US.
Also, can't one acknowledge both as threats to democratic values. When you can't trust journalists who the hell can you trust? It isn't one or the other, it's just that one may be more relevant to you while the other happens to be more relevant to me. That's why, I guess.
Posted by IxiSays who?Posted by SoulPosted by TinnedglassPosted by Soul
Sounds like it's a lighter way of your work laying you off.
Truth is you probably have nothing at all.
Haha not at all buddy. I am the CFO, so actually it means more work for me, they are sending me a lot of hard drives to munch on this quarantine days, sucks. Well i was present when the test showed positive, i don't know how is it that i may have nothing at all hahaha. 🤷♂️
I could name some crazy ways. Anyway only .04% of people die from it, so your chances are pretty good. Then again the source I got that from might be as skewed as the original number of cases the media released, which was proven to be completely off and much less. It makes me wonder if the kits world governments are sending to doctors are actually accurate, or purposely test positive for numbers. They would do that for political strength. Everyone knows everything medical related goes through the government first right?
Who am I kidding? The government would never do that, and we all should fully trust the government. They would never try to hurt their people.
It isn't a .04% death rate. Its a 4.6% death rate bro.
a number that is literally 115x larger.
4% death is a massive number of people. Literally more people than what is in the United States.click to expand