Is this considered rape - Gemini man
Also this was 100% rape.
People can debate about semantics, but its not about how hard he held you down or how rough he was being.
You told him you wanted protected sex. He refused and had unprotected sex, something you absolutely did not consent to.
This is a violation not just of your body but of your life and health.
People can debate about semantics, but its not about how hard he held you down or how rough he was being.
You told him you wanted protected sex. He refused and had unprotected sex, something you absolutely did not consent to.
This is a violation not just of your body but of your life and health.
Leave Your Feedback
We'd love to hear your thoughts! If you're not logged in, you can still share your feedback below. Your input helps us improve the experience for everyone. To post your own content or join the conversation, please log in or create an account.
Related Messages
Posted by AntiphatesI'd still read it just for that. And do what he did to the Nazis.Posted by Ram416
None.
I've been wanting to read Mein Kampf for a long time, but it's banned in many countries. I'm curious about what went on in the mind of that madman, for him to do what he did.
From what I've heard it really isn't that intetersting and almost a comedy gold.
We had a comedian touring around with reading parts of it and the Nazis that came to protest and threaten his life themselves couldn't help but laugh at some passages which then left them quite confused.click to expand
Posted by PiscesGal76I'm Catholic and pansexual, and I get where you're coming from - but without religious texts, I would never have learned where they went wrong and what they did wrong (the Bible takes bragging to another level, and exposes the weaknesses of Christianity). There are some religious books though that are truly about seeking a higher spiritual plane, e.g. Sufism, which helped produce the writings of Rumi.
Tbh, anything related to religion. I know I'll get bashed for it but it keeps people in a certain regime thats unhealthy for the world. It causes divided minds about sexuality (think adversity towards homosexuality), but also about race, and people think in rights and wrongs while it isnt that black n white. They think in sins while we're hardwired this way. Think lust for example, its normal to have sexual feelings,
I do understand that religion gives a certain stability in people's lives but at the same time, it causes wars aswell and that never should be ok. A lot of things are done in the name of the Lord (in any form of religion) which is indirectly not taking responsibility of your own actions.
And like someone said previously, religion solely isn't responsible for all the wars, divides and strifes that have happened in history. It's the misinterpretation of religion and its misuse by man for personal gain (power, money) that created those things. It is the choices and decisions we make when we read something, that is responsible for human idiocy.
Posted by LittleStar_IIPosted by xy_sighPosted by MyStarsShinePosted by LittleStar_IIPosted by smol
Not try to judge too much but who the fuck walks with their 4 year old 6 feet behind them in a parking lot?
👀
Exactly.....why isn't she holding his hand? 😐
The parking lot was sort empty. The thing was, the kid looked like he was carrying a heavy backpack.
Yeah I get that but kids dart around especially at that age and between the water and cars you would want to hang on to them. Just doesn’t seem normal. She’s like storming off and he’s trying to keep up. Seems like something is off.click to expand
There was a Mom at the playground the other day like that and I remember feeling super weird about it like I should report something but it seemed like it was the norm for them at the same time.
She was sitting on a bench with a friend while her son played and then she and her friend got up and just walked to their car. Never heard her say “ok let’s go” or anything to her son and she only looked back once to see if he was following her. 😩 It was wild. My mommy senses were screaming. I was prepared to take him home with me if she left him. It really looked like she didn’t care if he was coming or not...yet she took him to the playground in the first place so she can’t be that neglectful. Idk it was weird !!
The video seems weird too, but she did look like she kept looking back to make sure he was following her at least 😬
Posted by LittleStar_II
I wonder if it was a murder suicide but she just couldn’t kill the kid.
But it’s weird because they just finished their custody battle.
I fear this too
But is drowning a common suicide method ? Seems there are easier less painful ways to go....I honestly don’t know though
"equitable distribution of these resources, and that the only way you can actually do that, is that then you have to have a political, economic system that facilitates that. And then you get into the issues of human rights, justice, economic justice, social justice, and good governance or democratic governance"
The bolded part sounds very similar to: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". (I won't do other's homework for them, a simple search will tell you who uses that phrase regularly).
And the latter part of the sentence that follows is vague (intentionally or not).
There are plenty of historical examples, especially from the mid 20th century, that show you where that road leads, and its generally (or generously) paved with blood, deprivation, and true human suffering.
There is even a contemporary example in Venezuela, which no one seems to want to talk about now, although the system being put in place there was lauded in the beginning until its bitter fruits became evident.
The basic fault in that paragraph you quote is a blind spot to human nature, and at the root of that fault is envy, often accompanied by hate.
I see the terms "economic justice" and :social justice" as loaded terms, and when you dig deep enough, more often than not those using those terms are promoting the practice of taking the products of one person's labor and giving it to another who has not earned it, and when done by coercion (which is the inevitable requirement to make things "just" by whatever that word means according to the whim of the day) , is essentially institutionalized theft.
I haven't looked up the author of the phrase you quote, but I will.
The bolded part sounds very similar to: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". (I won't do other's homework for them, a simple search will tell you who uses that phrase regularly).
And the latter part of the sentence that follows is vague (intentionally or not).
There are plenty of historical examples, especially from the mid 20th century, that show you where that road leads, and its generally (or generously) paved with blood, deprivation, and true human suffering.
There is even a contemporary example in Venezuela, which no one seems to want to talk about now, although the system being put in place there was lauded in the beginning until its bitter fruits became evident.
The basic fault in that paragraph you quote is a blind spot to human nature, and at the root of that fault is envy, often accompanied by hate.
I see the terms "economic justice" and :social justice" as loaded terms, and when you dig deep enough, more often than not those using those terms are promoting the practice of taking the products of one person's labor and giving it to another who has not earned it, and when done by coercion (which is the inevitable requirement to make things "just" by whatever that word means according to the whim of the day) , is essentially institutionalized theft.
I haven't looked up the author of the phrase you quote, but I will.
Posted by CancerOnTheCuspOk. I looked it up.
"equitable distribution of these resources, and that the only way you can actually do that, is that then you have to have a political, economic system that facilitates that. And then you get into the issues of human rights, justice, economic justice, social justice, and good governance or democratic governance"
The bolded part sounds very similar to: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". (I won't do other's homework for them, a simple search will tell you who uses that phrase regularly).
And the latter part of the sentence that follows is vague (intentionally or not).
There are plenty of historical examples, especially from the mid 20th century, that show you where that road leads, and its generally (or generously) paved with blood, deprivation, and true human suffering.
There is even a contemporary example in Venezuela, which no one seems to want to talk about now, although the system being put in place there was lauded in the beginning until its bitter fruits became evident.
The basic fault in that paragraph you quote is a blind spot to human nature, and at the root of that fault is envy, often accompanied by hate.
I see the terms "economic justice" and :social justice" as loaded terms, and when you dig deep enough, more often than not those using those terms are promoting the practice of taking the products of one person's labor and giving it to another who has not earned it, and when done by coercion (which is the inevitable requirement to make things "just" by whatever that word means according to the whim of the day) , is essentially institutionalized theft.
I haven't looked up the author of the phrase you quote, but I will.
On the surface, her work with the Greenbelt Movement seems laudable.
But apparently there is a mention of a cloud when she received her Nobel regarding an alleged statement regarding the origin of HIV/AIDS.
I'll dig more later.
Posted by PinsAndNeedles
Imagine someone waiting for you to divorce/break up just to prove an argument? That's the stumbling rock no one wants to nurture.
🤣🤣🤣
Posted by PinsAndNeedlesYupPosted by ELIGABPosted by PinsAndNeedles
Imagine someone waiting for you to divorce/break up just to prove an argument? That's the stumbling rock no one wants to nurture.
🤣🤣🤣
You get me. Life's just mad dull to sit at sidelines waiting for someone to trip up your way. 😂😂click to expand
😂😂
Virgo 100% ~ ...
Posted by smolIn decreasing order of how much of my thoughts they occupy..
Mine,
Out of affection:
taurus, pisces, leo, aquarius
out of fear of potential danger:
cap, scorpio, aquarius, leo, aries. gemini, sag