Basic White Bitch Culture
Posted by AstrobynBecause that's colonizer culture. A lot of those people are colonizers, have been colonized, or benefit from colonizing.
Is it just me that feels like this group gets put down and criticized for everything to do say think, drink or smell.
Or am I Just more sensitive to it because I am a woman, white enough to fit into this group?
I guess I’ve always seen parts of our culture make fun of white people, and maybe that’s normal in a society or system that priorities that group over others.
But I feel like women take a larger brunt of that criticism. Their Uggs, latte’s, candles.
Can someone explain this, expand on it or correct me?
Leave Your Feedback
We'd love to hear your thoughts! If you're not logged in, you can still share your feedback below. Your input helps us improve the experience for everyone. To post your own content or join the conversation, please log in or create an account.
Related Messages
My dog. There is something about going out on a hiking trail and watching her run through the streams and woods while smelling every scent and just absolutely loving every second of it that makes me feel less cold inside. I could go to the exact same place every single day and her reaction would still be the exact same level of excitement each time. I love how dogs don't have the ability to feel jaded when it comes to being outside. It makes me smile and kind of forget about my own human bs. There are a ton of dead or living humans I'd love to speak with, but nothing feels as good as walking with my dog.
Hey bro
He is 37 not 35, oops. When I googled it came up July 3, 1984, as his birthday. Also his Pluto might be opposed to her moon. Maybe she is still alive. But it doesn't feel like it. When I googled it again he came up as 22 years old - hmmm
He is follicly challenged - I bet he is 37 years old. I think there is some confusion. But he does look younger. I watched a body language video and the 4 experts didn't really come up with him being a killer type (very compliant). Maybe she jumped off the cliff on her own.
He is follicly challenged - I bet he is 37 years old. I think there is some confusion. But he does look younger. I watched a body language video and the 4 experts didn't really come up with him being a killer type (very compliant). Maybe she jumped off the cliff on her own.
Signed Up: Feb 12, 2020
Comments: 736 · Posts: 1348 · Topics: 11
Comments: 736 · Posts: 1348 · Topics: 11
Posted by alexscariesPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by beautifulsoul74
The topic is pretty easy to answer.
Simply, you don’t get to be “rich” without cheating somebody or something it’s an imbalance in the system. Let’s be real here, people who are rich really don’t generate that wealth. The people who work for them do. Rich people exist because of how the fruits of labor are divided.
Nonsense. Create something that a lot of ppl (think they) want and that's affordable and you'll get rich in no time without cheating anyone.
Bezos,Zuckerberg,Steve Jobs, J.K. Rowling..... all rich cuz they provided something we wanted and needed, which again, is what made them rich, and fairly so. What, we suppose to limit how much a person is legally allowed to make and distribute it evenly all across the boards in the name of good ol' socialism?
Explain to me how the fruits of say J.K. Rowling's labor is unfairly and wrongfully divided. Who did she CHEAT by writing something a lot of ppl wanted to read?
Rowling stole her ideas from lots of authors. She has been sued a few times for this. It didn't stick because she is too famous, it would be like suing Disney for Mickey Mouse - also an episode of The Simpsons.
Rowling's books are shit and if someone is over 40 and using a Harry Potter bag then they really need to grow up. Nobody wanted to read Harry Potter or Fifty Shades it was hyped as must read.
Zuckerberg we needed validation for uploading a picture of our dinner, our kids, our holiday villa? Once again it was invented, hyped, but not needed. People are leaving Facebook in their thousands everyday. And the guy is creepy.
Steve Jobs - been accused of stealing ideas. His products were niche up until the iPlayer. Even at the time companies were producing better products at more affordable prices. iTunes is a scam ask Bruce Willis. Apple products are cheap shit made in Chinese factories, their workers probably paid well below a living wage. The prices vastly inflated above their actual value.
Bezos - actually I think this one lies in its convenience. Everything in one place. I think the criticism was towards crushing small bookshops, now it seems to be other businesses.click to expand
Some of the dumbest most simple-minded shit I read. So ok then, if “nobody wanted Harry Potter and Fifty Shades”, you tell us what the world wants then. Go ahead!
Rowling didn’t steal shit. All litterature, art, music, movies are recycled. No matter what you do, it’s been done before. What you do is you tell it in your own voice. Unless she stole a finished manuscript, the books are in fact her intellectual property because she fucking spent years writing them. Plagiarizm claims have been tried and dismissed in court, ranging from ”a scene” to “espectacled boy with dark hair”, “a castle on a lake”, “a receiving room and wooden doors” as if those things can only exist in one work of fiction.
And have you seen those fucking books? They are bricks. At least the last few. You telling me she stole a 24-page childrens booklet and it magically ended up thousands upon thousands of pages long? Get real, whoever she supposedly “plagiarized” clearly didn’t do a good enough job to get the recognition. She did it her way and got rich because people wanted to read what SHE had written.
Social media was already becoming a thing when Zuckerberg had the most successful concept for what it could be at that particular place in time. His wealth is the result of being the best in giving milions something they needed, wanted, desired, call it what you want. Are you saying that if someone provides us with a service we didn’t want or need before its creation, that the creator shouldn’t cash in on it? Frankly I’m not following your logic here at all or what your point is.
Whether or not he is “creepy” whatever that means in this context, is completely irrelevant to the topic of whether or not he has the right to be wealthy for his invention.
Steve Jobs – mostly your own opinions on Apple quality. Thank you for your opinion. Lol @ been accused of stealing ideas. 1. A lot of people can be accused of stealing 2. Ideas mean shit until they are brought out of the abstract and into the real world, which is what Jobs did. As for China, you should complain about Jobs taking his business to other countries insteads of providing work for Americans. Good thing for the Chinese though, creating work opportunities. He is rightfully rich because people buy his shit. Good for him.
Bezos. If anyone desevres to be rich on this list it’s this guy. I mean you said it yourself, he made the world more convenient to what must be at least 1 bilion people. So he should desist doing that because it’s closing down small bookshops .. Why in the world do “small bookshops” have a god given right to exist if someone else’s idea makes them obsolete? Or any other business for that matter?
Yeah here’s he tiniest violin playing for all the horse traders put out of business with the invention of the car engine.
Posted by Shadeberry
Are you sure he murdered her? I can’t find anything in the news.
I just saw two news articles that stated she was the aggressor and was hitting him, while driving (not sure who was driving), and they hit a curb.
“Laundrie says on the video the couple got into a minor scuffle that began when he climbed into the van with dirty feet, and said he didn't want to pursue a domestic violence charge against Petito, who officers decided was the aggressor.”
https://www.npr.org/2021/09/18/1038543489/gabby-petito-brian-laundrie-missing-boyfriend
“ On August 12, in Moab, officers considered charging Petito with domestic violence after she said that she slapped Laundrie during a dispute and hit him again while they were getting pulled over. The officers declined to charge Petito after she told them she had no intention to physically hurt or impair Laundrie. Petito said Laundrie had stopped her from getting into the van earlier by telling her she needed to calm down first.”
https://www.insider.com/gabby-petito-bodycam-boyfriend-fiance-missing-update-instagram-travel-influencer-2021-9
I don’t know the details. I am not saying Laundrie is innocent, nor am I defending him. I just think people should try to at least say that they are speculating or claim that it is an opinion, rather than stating it like a fact because you’re doing a disservice to her if she is still alive and can be found. Either way, I hope she is found soon.
His actions kinda say he's responsible. He came back and didn't say anything about her missing until it became obvious after a long while. Then lawyered up and still refused to say anything about what he knew. Now, it appears he's escaped. She would have contacted someone long ago by now if she was able to.
I guess Im charismatic. I dont really engage ppl unleas I have to. But when I do ppl like to talk to me. So from the comments on here I guess a charmer is someone who turns it on when they want to. Ive met way too many ppl like that. I just let whatever comes to me come.
Posted by alexscariesDo you think the films are shit too?Posted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by beautifulsoul74
The topic is pretty easy to answer.
Simply, you don’t get to be “rich” without cheating somebody or something it’s an imbalance in the system. Let’s be real here, people who are rich really don’t generate that wealth. The people who work for them do. Rich people exist because of how the fruits of labor are divided.
Nonsense. Create something that a lot of ppl (think they) want and that's affordable and you'll get rich in no time without cheating anyone.
Bezos,Zuckerberg,Steve Jobs, J.K. Rowling..... all rich cuz they provided something we wanted and needed, which again, is what made them rich, and fairly so. What, we suppose to limit how much a person is legally allowed to make and distribute it evenly all across the boards in the name of good ol' socialism?
Explain to me how the fruits of say J.K. Rowling's labor is unfairly and wrongfully divided. Who did she CHEAT by writing something a lot of ppl wanted to read?
Rowling stole her ideas from lots of authors. She has been sued a few times for this. It didn't stick because she is too famous, it would be like suing Disney for Mickey Mouse - also an episode of The Simpsons.
Rowling's books are shit and if someone is over 40 and using a Harry Potter bag then they really need to grow up. Nobody wanted to read Harry Potter or Fifty Shades it was hyped as must read.
Zuckerberg we needed validation for uploading a picture of our dinner, our kids, our holiday villa? Once again it was invented, hyped, but not needed. People are leaving Facebook in their thousands everyday. And the guy is creepy.
Steve Jobs - been accused of stealing ideas. His products were niche up until the iPlayer. Even at the time companies were producing better products at more affordable prices. iTunes is a scam ask Bruce Willis. Apple products are cheap shit made in Chinese factories, their workers probably paid well below a living wage. The prices vastly inflated above their actual value.
Bezos - actually I think this one lies in its convenience. Everything in one place. I think the criticism was towards crushing small bookshops, now it seems to be other businesses.click to expand
Posted by SoulGood point. Thats how capitalism works and thats what gives us our "freedoms" and way of life as we know it. If one follows the corporate way then you cant really blame them. Cause thats what business literally does is funnel money into huge quantities.
It's just human nature. Even at our most primitive some humans with less food and resources envied those who had more then them. I'm sure some lived comfortably in the middle, and paid little attention to either, but the most famined and poor would look at the better off like they put them into that position. Which they do, but also didn't at the same time.
I can see it from both perspectives though. When you have a tool like the internet and can see the turmoil of society and people starving, it's easy to think "Well if billionaires gave even a small percentage away it would help so many people." Which is true, but also that takes away from their businesses and future goals, which would kill jobs and hurt people at the same time. Also if they were forced to give away their earning, or only able to only make a set amount of money then make no more, everyone would just cash out and all the things that make our lives convenient like Amazon wouldn't exist anymore.
The fact eventually all the world's weath will inevitably end up in the hands of small few and how terrifying that actually is can wait for another topic.
Many people hate and they dont realize theyre part of the reason. Which is why i dont hate or envy them.
Posted by alexscariesBut do you think they’re technically good?Posted by MyStarsShinePosted by alexscariesPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by beautifulsoul74
The topic is pretty easy to answer.
Simply, you don’t get to be “rich” without cheating somebody or something it’s an imbalance in the system. Let’s be real here, people who are rich really don’t generate that wealth. The people who work for them do. Rich people exist because of how the fruits of labor are divided.
Nonsense. Create something that a lot of ppl (think they) want and that's affordable and you'll get rich in no time without cheating anyone.
Bezos,Zuckerberg,Steve Jobs, J.K. Rowling..... all rich cuz they provided something we wanted and needed, which again, is what made them rich, and fairly so. What, we suppose to limit how much a person is legally allowed to make and distribute it evenly all across the boards in the name of good ol' socialism?
Explain to me how the fruits of say J.K. Rowling's labor is unfairly and wrongfully divided. Who did she CHEAT by writing something a lot of ppl wanted to read?
Rowling stole her ideas from lots of authors. She has been sued a few times for this. It didn't stick because she is too famous, it would be like suing Disney for Mickey Mouse - also an episode of The Simpsons.
Rowling's books are shit and if someone is over 40 and using a Harry Potter bag then they really need to grow up. Nobody wanted to read Harry Potter or Fifty Shades it was hyped as must read.
Zuckerberg we needed validation for uploading a picture of our dinner, our kids, our holiday villa? Once again it was invented, hyped, but not needed. People are leaving Facebook in their thousands everyday. And the guy is creepy.
Steve Jobs - been accused of stealing ideas. His products were niche up until the iPlayer. Even at the time companies were producing better products at more affordable prices. iTunes is a scam ask Bruce Willis. Apple products are cheap shit made in Chinese factories, their workers probably paid well below a living wage. The prices vastly inflated above their actual value.
Bezos - actually I think this one lies in its convenience. Everything in one place. I think the criticism was towards crushing small bookshops, now it seems to be other businesses.
Do you think the films are shit too?
They're not for me. I'm not into fantasy films in general.click to expand
Posted by alexscariesI found them enchanting ✨Posted by MyStarsShinePosted by alexscariesPosted by MyStarsShinePosted by alexscariesPosted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by beautifulsoul74
The topic is pretty easy to answer.
Simply, you don’t get to be “rich” without cheating somebody or something it’s an imbalance in the system. Let’s be real here, people who are rich really don’t generate that wealth. The people who work for them do. Rich people exist because of how the fruits of labor are divided.
Nonsense. Create something that a lot of ppl (think they) want and that's affordable and you'll get rich in no time without cheating anyone.
Bezos,Zuckerberg,Steve Jobs, J.K. Rowling..... all rich cuz they provided something we wanted and needed, which again, is what made them rich, and fairly so. What, we suppose to limit how much a person is legally allowed to make and distribute it evenly all across the boards in the name of good ol' socialism?
Explain to me how the fruits of say J.K. Rowling's labor is unfairly and wrongfully divided. Who did she CHEAT by writing something a lot of ppl wanted to read?
Rowling stole her ideas from lots of authors. She has been sued a few times for this. It didn't stick because she is too famous, it would be like suing Disney for Mickey Mouse - also an episode of The Simpsons.
Rowling's books are shit and if someone is over 40 and using a Harry Potter bag then they really need to grow up. Nobody wanted to read Harry Potter or Fifty Shades it was hyped as must read.
Zuckerberg we needed validation for uploading a picture of our dinner, our kids, our holiday villa? Once again it was invented, hyped, but not needed. People are leaving Facebook in their thousands everyday. And the guy is creepy.
Steve Jobs - been accused of stealing ideas. His products were niche up until the iPlayer. Even at the time companies were producing better products at more affordable prices. iTunes is a scam ask Bruce Willis. Apple products are cheap shit made in Chinese factories, their workers probably paid well below a living wage. The prices vastly inflated above their actual value.
Bezos - actually I think this one lies in its convenience. Everything in one place. I think the criticism was towards crushing small bookshops, now it seems to be other businesses.
Do you think the films are shit too?
They're not for me. I'm not into fantasy films in general.
But do you think they’re technically good?
From what I've seen yes, but I've not seen one all the way through. I like dramas and gangster films. I think Daniel Radcliffe has really come on as an actor, his acting in the early film is pretty bad.click to expand
*Strong Neptune*