I rather thought she was just having fun as opposed to writing a how to manual.
Anyway, it only works till we figure it out.
Now woman that I personally have known to play the helpless female have been Pisces.
It also only applies to our real daughters. I did not get the impression she was telling woman to try and capture a virgo male by acting like a child.
I thought she felt like bragging about her father because perhaps she was in a good mood, therefore the whole thread was meant to be light hearted, unless I seriously missed something.
Signed Up:
Apr 13, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 44084 · Topics: 685
I got the impression that she was talking about how to get a Virgo, and used her father as an example because that is one in her life.
If he's your dad .. you've already "got" him, so what is the point of the thread then, in explaining how to get him?
I'll pass ... me and my Virgo are on the same level, there is no wrapping, thank goodness.
Signed Up:
Apr 13, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 44084 · Topics: 685
My question is ... if he was like this from day one, and you didn't like how he kept himself from day one ... then why are you currently experiencing him past that day?
In your post .... the only nice thing you said about him is that he's a sweetheart and means well .. after that initial 6 words to put up here so we will be left with an impression that you mean well when you bash him .. you then spent 2 paragraphs complaining about his attributes, behaviours, and flaws that you don't like.
Hmm ... 2 things you do like versus 2 paragraphs filled with things you don't like.
Why is this? Because you were looking for someone to fix and decided that he wasn't?
And you would really have the audacity to question him? When the only reason you even stayed with him is because you wanted to fix something to suit you, rather than having something as is to cherish.
"he's sweet to me but that's not gonna secure a roof over his head. neither is his attitude."
^^^^^^^^^^ .. oh, I think I get it now ... you are looking for a roof over your head, so this is about materialistic .. you thought you could tolerate him so long as he provided AND was willing to change .... but, he can only do one of those, which is provide something to you and you just don't think it's worth tolerating to have this provision unless he is willing to change along the way.
Fuck that he means well .. that isn't important .. fuck that.
A woman would rather have superficial and undearing feelings ... and a roof, in which the man under this roof he provided is perfect according soley to the woman's standards.
Signed Up:
Apr 13, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 44084 · Topics: 685
Oh, I see I mis-read that .. pardon.
It's not a roof over your head for the securing ... it's one over HIS head.
What is that suppose to mean?
"he's sweet to me but that's not gonna secure a roof over his head. neither is his attitude."
Excuse me? Is that really impying what I think it is?
Signed Up:
Apr 13, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 44084 · Topics: 685
None of this makes sense to me ... why would you, or anybody else, get into a relationship in which you didn't like the other persons standards of living?
How many times does a person have to be told that you cannot change anybody except yourself before this finally sinks in?
From day ONE you didn't like the way he lived ..... so what the fuck?
Signed Up:
Apr 13, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 44084 · Topics: 685
This man isn't broken or defective ... there is nothing wrong with him.
He is himself, and that's the only person he needs to be.
The broken person is yourself .... for you are the one who didn't like his standard of living, and agreed to a relationship, regardless .. to your own unhappiness.
That makes YOU broken .. not him.
I agree with Bella.
My daughter used to kid like that when she was in a good mood, but in truth we both knew I was more the guy from meet the parents.
Signed Up:
Apr 13, 2005Comments: 0 · Posts: 44084 · Topics: 685
It is mis-leading .... as well as the first couple sentences.