my heart is broken
Posted by MontgomeryPosted by willhe
Am a virgo...me and this leo man were friends for almost a year now...we started it online and we met once in real life as we both live in 2 different countries....it started casually but recently we become closer and he started flirting and complimenting me...we were both flirting to the extend I thought we were together...I even joked about feeling jealous of his female friends and he didn't seem like it bothered him ..he was reacting actually to me pursuing him...thats why I thought it was time to ask him if I was special to him...his answer shocked me because it was too honest and direct...he said: you are a special friend! And that its a very nice and respectful friendship that he is proud of...I cant explain the pain i felt...
Is that ONE statement what did it for you?
Or was there more that was said?
Also.. is English his first language?click to expand
English is not his first language...and it's not mine neither
yes this is it....only this short statement ...but it was very obvious that he knows am in love and trying to set things clear to me ...it was a very short conversation that started when we were exchanging our photos ( he thinks am too beautiful...and they are normal photos by the way)
it started when i asked him if there are any other female photos on his mobile, he said: well your photo is one of the very few on my mobile,, i don't save girls' photos but i like yours a lot..
then i tried to understand where i stand in his life by telling him i thought i was special ...only few means there r others....then he joked around and said well yeah
and when i asked him again am i special? he said what he said....
don't you think it's enough to get the idea that am just a friend to him?
Leave Your Feedback
We'd love to hear your thoughts! If you're not logged in, you can still share your feedback below. Your input helps us improve the experience for everyone. To post your own content or join the conversation, please log in or create an account.
Related Messages
My bff is married to a Pisces man and she was previously married to a Libra, she has never been as happy as she is now. They are expecting their first child together in a few weeks. 
I also get along with Pisces men and women. I have dated a few Pisces, the ones I dated were NOT clingy, they were fun, funny, creative, and romantic. I think it depends if it's a young Gem/Pisces vs evolved Gem/Pisces.
I also get along with Pisces men and women. I have dated a few Pisces, the ones I dated were NOT clingy, they were fun, funny, creative, and romantic. I think it depends if it's a young Gem/Pisces vs evolved Gem/Pisces.
Haven't seen signs of a big scary shakeup, but have been contemplating some changes...
Posted by LadyOfRebirth
Look at all the fire moon haters! *waves*
They're just jealous.
Do you know the Muppet man?
Posted by Damnata
I've seen patterns lately. It started last month.
No where, on any other sign board you will see the madness that is here with their opposite.
This topic was made tongue in cheek to showcase an amazing couple..there would be no other couple to have 2 Nobel Prizes between them...but do you see them talking about it?
NOOOO..they are so far deep the delusion, they actually believe I'm stating that was the only couple that made it...and started emoting and obsessing again..so it's really not my fault reality escapes them.
On a more serious note, the reason you're seeing the responses on this particular thread is because of the title and some of the things you've posted in your responses. You are implying that it is impossible for this type of relationship to work. If we approach relationships with such negativity, of coarse it won't work!!
One of the things I've personally noticed is the Taurus/Scorpio relationship is one only understood by those of us born under either sign. There are moments where when we had the few spats we've had, I was able to release stress. I've never felt bitter towards them after our very brief arguments. I'm not obsessed with any of them, though, so I don't know where you're getting that from and there has been one and may have been others who I absolutely hated. That aside, if I get along with them, I really do treat them like I do with all those I get along with and consider mine.
I find most of porn very comical. I prefer books and magazines.
Signed Up: Nov 17, 2012
Comments: 22 · Posts: 6178 · Topics: 30
Comments: 22 · Posts: 6178 · Topics: 30
The user who posted this message has hidden it.
Funny, I rarely see a slim girl wearing sheer leggings (or any skimpy, see-through anything), it's always the big girls that do it. Maybe it makes them feel sexy or whatever.
One of my friends is a really big girl & she believes that any outfit she doesnt wrestle with must be too big for her. She squeezes herself into the tiniest of things. Don't know how she does it. Sadly they make her look even bigger because they are squeezing her in all the wrong places, creating several bulges in the process. She is a VERY confident person, though. I like & envy that about her.
One of my friends is a really big girl & she believes that any outfit she doesnt wrestle with must be too big for her. She squeezes herself into the tiniest of things. Don't know how she does it. Sadly they make her look even bigger because they are squeezing her in all the wrong places, creating several bulges in the process. She is a VERY confident person, though. I like & envy that about her.
Posted by TwirlingStrawberry
I will share my kale chips and salsa.
Mmmm....sounds good!
Factoring in cultural influences is fine. In fact, cultural anthropology, like astrology, is another field that looks at things from a high level of abstraction. You'll see all sorts of generalizations about the nature of societies (e.g. collectivist vs. indivudalist), core values of societies (e.g. honor/shame-based vs. guilt-based), psychology of its members (e.g. three-zone or dyadic personalities in Mediterranean anthro.), etc. No dispositions, traits, habits, etc. exist in a cultural vacuum and no one is saying they do.
Again, no one is saying that every Taurus or Scorpio is loyal, just as no one is saying every Aries is assertive, or every Cancer is sensitive, every Libra is indecisive, etc. With astrology, we're generalizing about inclinations, influences, and tendencies. Your point about psychology is also off base. Firstly, there are many different fields of psychology and very few that even deal with classifying people according to broad personality types. The kind of traits discussed in psychological texts usually don't even overlap all that much with key astrological traits of the sun signs. Psychologists don't really spend much time trying to figure out why people are prone to jealousy, or more intuitive than others, for instance. And if they do, its highly theoretical (like most of psychology). Saying that looking at sun signs as endowing us with certain inclinations is conflicting with psychology, is like saying genetics conflicts with psychology, because the latter endows us with certain dispositions. We can be classified as genetically inclined to depression, and still be helpfully diagnosed with a psychological disorder that encompasses depressive symptoms. Neither astrology, cultural studies, or genetics rule out the explanatory efficacy of psychology. They're actually complimentary in how they help to explain the enormous complexity of the human person.
Again, no one is saying that every Taurus or Scorpio is loyal, just as no one is saying every Aries is assertive, or every Cancer is sensitive, every Libra is indecisive, etc. With astrology, we're generalizing about inclinations, influences, and tendencies. Your point about psychology is also off base. Firstly, there are many different fields of psychology and very few that even deal with classifying people according to broad personality types. The kind of traits discussed in psychological texts usually don't even overlap all that much with key astrological traits of the sun signs. Psychologists don't really spend much time trying to figure out why people are prone to jealousy, or more intuitive than others, for instance. And if they do, its highly theoretical (like most of psychology). Saying that looking at sun signs as endowing us with certain inclinations is conflicting with psychology, is like saying genetics conflicts with psychology, because the latter endows us with certain dispositions. We can be classified as genetically inclined to depression, and still be helpfully diagnosed with a psychological disorder that encompasses depressive symptoms. Neither astrology, cultural studies, or genetics rule out the explanatory efficacy of psychology. They're actually complimentary in how they help to explain the enormous complexity of the human person.