In keeping with topic, I would trade places with Taurusgoddess, just so that I can sort that man of hers out..slap him silly for a day..
And also SIL - She is the epitome of cool, calm & collected...and cos I want to have a sneak preview of her relationship with the delectable Virguy..
And also SIL - She is the epitome of cool, calm & collected...and cos I want to have a sneak preview of her relationship with the delectable Virguy..
Leave Your Feedback
We'd love to hear your thoughts! If you're not logged in, you can still share your feedback below. Your input helps us improve the experience for everyone. To post your own content or join the conversation, please log in or create an account.
Related Messages
"This is a subject that I have been studying for quite some time now."
what do you think? i know you don't want to support one side's claims, but i'm just interested to see the opinions you've formed.
what do you think? i know you don't want to support one side's claims, but i'm just interested to see the opinions you've formed.
"You were responding to my comment about there being "no scientific evidence..." My comment concerned biological evidence. "
Yes, it may concern it, but what you actually said was-"To date, THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that supports the conjecture that women are more emotional than men." A categorical, false statement.
Heck, you even used CAPS LOCK.
Yes, it may concern it, but what you actually said was-"To date, THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that supports the conjecture that women are more emotional than men." A categorical, false statement.
Heck, you even used CAPS LOCK.
"Please read my comments about this being circulatory."
Women concern themselves more with emotions->women are more emotional.
How is that circulatory?
Women concern themselves more with emotions->women are more emotional.
How is that circulatory?
about the differences between men and women
and i apologize for boring you...you really don't have to answer, i'll be ok...eventually
and i apologize for boring you...you really don't have to answer, i'll be ok...eventually
"You don't really read my posts, do you?"
Some of them, yes.
An analogy-a person is argues against oil being able to extinguish fire and says "there is no evidence of fire EVER being extinguished."
Is the person right?
Some of them, yes.
An analogy-a person is argues against oil being able to extinguish fire and says "there is no evidence of fire EVER being extinguished."
Is the person right?
-is.
Fucking aborted edits.
Fucking aborted edits.
yama, honestly, everyone knew what she meant, of course there is evidence, but is it reliable, and does it truly prove anything, maybe not.
and your analogy sucks, you still have to inlcude the oil.
and your analogy sucks, you still have to inlcude the oil.
ugh, not EVEN because of the oil. because this is about evidence, if someone wanted to, they could just fabricate something that says "oh yeah, fire can definitely be extinguished by oil for X reason, here's a reason why." is the reason actually proved, not likely.
notso, i see, and what are the chances that anything presented in this thread could change your view on that?
"yama, honestly, everyone knew what she meant, of course there is evidence, but is it reliable, and does it truly prove anything, maybe not."
Ah, the ubiquitous "everyone".
"and your analogy sucks, you still have to inlcude the oil."
Why should I? She said nothing about intrinsic biological processes.
"I think that we believe that there is more of a difference than what actually exists. Aside from the physical and hormonal differences, beliefs about the way women and men behave are exaggerated and environmentally constructed, resulting in acquired differences in attitudes. Gender roles are dealt out according to the culture and time period."
Probably.
"ugh, not EVEN because of the oil. because this is about evidence, if someone wanted to, they could just fabricate something that says "oh yeah, fire can definitely be extinguished by oil for X reason, here's a reason why." is the reason actually proved, not likely."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but your problem with this study is that there's an off chance of it being fabricated?
That's pretty silly.
Ah, the ubiquitous "everyone".
"and your analogy sucks, you still have to inlcude the oil."
Why should I? She said nothing about intrinsic biological processes.
"I think that we believe that there is more of a difference than what actually exists. Aside from the physical and hormonal differences, beliefs about the way women and men behave are exaggerated and environmentally constructed, resulting in acquired differences in attitudes. Gender roles are dealt out according to the culture and time period."
Probably.
"ugh, not EVEN because of the oil. because this is about evidence, if someone wanted to, they could just fabricate something that says "oh yeah, fire can definitely be extinguished by oil for X reason, here's a reason why." is the reason actually proved, not likely."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but your problem with this study is that there's an off chance of it being fabricated?
That's pretty silly.