Am I approaching this right
Posted by Capsunin8thhousemarsScorpIt’s ok. Dxp doesn’t have rules unless you are a paid member...lmao
It was a different question. My apologies if that is incorrect to post a follow up question.
That letter was nice. However if he is in a limbo - no amount of communications from you will change anything.
As an example. Me and Scorp weren’t communicating due to his ‘period’ and when i found legit reason to text him I did.
He was answering in one word sentences.
I was crushed. But kept texting because I needed something of his stuff for my business. I was inquiring if he got not so I can get it from him.
After about 10th text - he writes by himself ‘can I call?’...and madness continuing...
So one thing I’ve learned is that you can DIE - but Scorpio man will do what he wants whenever he wants and ready!
You can literally drop dead but you’ll never make him step over his wants and willing to do what you want. And it doesn’t mean he doesn’t love you.
There is some ‘thing’ he can’t overcome that is squishing his guts until it let go and let’s him to breath and live.
Most likely - you won’t get a response to this. But if you wait - you will get some result. Good luck! My heart goes in to you.
And I am in a same boat with you right now...so I understand...
Leave Your Feedback
We'd love to hear your thoughts! If you're not logged in, you can still share your feedback below. Your input helps us improve the experience for everyone. To post your own content or join the conversation, please log in or create an account.
Related Messages
Pluto is slow moving so it depends on the orbs.
Also, outer planets aspect is generational.
Also, outer planets aspect is generational.
Posted by Librasettingnothing wrong with being wholesomely naughtyPosted by tctaoLol people and their naughty minds 😜Posted by Librasettinghow kinky - LOLPosted by tctaoJust my Jupiter and some asteroids lol I know my Lucifer asteroid is there 😇😈 lolPosted by Librasettinglol - do you have Scorpio in your chart ?Posted by tctaoLol I've been called mysterious by a cancer girl who thought I was a ScorpioPosted by sierra_libra sun and venus, Taurus moon, scorpio rising and mars, virgo mercury - yeah he's mysterious
like almost shady.. they're pretty controversial, seem to hold secrets for many years and some things come out about them and you're like: "wow i can't believe he/she would do that" coz they seem so chill
chris brown, bill clinton, lindsay lohan, robert downey jr, prince harry, prince charles, hugh grant, floyd mayweather jr, carrie fisher, kobe bryant, monica lewinski, joe biden, kathy griffin, dr. phil, dennis rodman (with the whole north korea thing), rob lowe, david boreanaz
so i made a thread about scorpio moons being whistleblowers, the type who'd reveal secrets for some cause so i thought...
what about taurus moons?
be it in life (like greta garbo) or in death (natalie wood), there's some shroud of mystery to them
you'd think it's the scorpio moon but no, the ones that tend to keep things to themselves seem to be this oneclick to expand
Posted by SeleukosPosted by LadyNeptuneAnd yet to felt the need to hijack this thread in most toxic way possible.Posted by SeleukosI've said several times that men should talk about their problems with a professional. And guess what...earning 30% more means they have more access to those resources.Posted by LadyNeptuneYeah, letsgo with personal attacks. That always makes things better right?Posted by SeleukosMoney means everything.
The point is that money means nothing if there are other more grave problems that needs to solved in the areas of equality.
To claim it doesn't means either you've never had to go without...or your country has excellent free healthcare.
In order to get help with depression or suicidal ideation (to use your example) you need professional care. Professional care cost $ $ $ . If your earning 30% more than half of the population you have more opportunities to obtain said care.
So to reiterate, cry about it in therapy.
Money doesn't mean everything. It is important sure but you can have all the money you want and still be depressed and end up killing yourself. That was the point of my statement regarding your first.
Accusing me of not understanding the importance of money due to a possible background is pointless because it' meaningless. It adds nothing to the discussion nor does refute one of my points.
Why not working together instead of fighting about something that we at it's base level agree upon.
Women should have equal pay. No one is denying that.
But men also should be allowed to talk about their problems without being attacked for a problem they man not even be personally responible for.
What do you hope to gain by that? Is it a ego thing?
Personal attack? Wow so emotional.
My question remains: Why?
Noting that you clumsily tried to attack me on an emotiona/personal level either in argument or use of language doesn't mean I'm personally offendend.
Insinuating I would be is a age old rhetorical trick. Nothing more.
Standig up for mens need to talk or other needs is good and I thank you for that.
This however isn't invalidating my points.
Assuming the behaviour you are showing here would be the general reaction men had to face whenever they open up about one of their personal problems, do you think any amount of therapy would prevent them from suicide if they had to face this everyday without any emotional support in form of family etc. ?
Would it be okay if a man would burt into a discussion about rape and the ensuing traumata women have to deal with only to point at a different problem?
No matter how important that problem may be it would still, in the best case, hurt a couple of people and, in the worst case, turn all those people against you.
All you achieve by acting the way you do is damaging the cause you are fighting for because you're alienating other people and turn them against it.
Not because you're cause is wrong or anything. You're achieving all of that by simply not acting with common sense.
Youn can't want that if you were trully for pay equality. That's why I asked if this is an ego thing.click to expand
Uggghhhh.
If you think I'm toxic fine. But to say I hijack the thread, have ego, am attacking you, blah blah blah. You sought me out. You replied to my comment...repeatedly. If you don't like what I have to say, block me, don't engage with me, whatever.
I'm not going to censor my opinion cause you have hurt feels. Get over yourself.
I've talked about this with my (male) friends many times and they pretty much agree with what the article says, this world is built by men for men without truly understanding men or people in general. I mean who does really fit the mold?
Signed Up: Jul 28, 2016
Comments: 4222 · Posts: 6474 · Topics: 83
Comments: 4222 · Posts: 6474 · Topics: 83
Posted by LittleStarumm. Ancient Rome. The vikings... It's there trust me.Posted by SupesName whites that have had systems in place to discriminate against them as a whole through out the past 300 years.Posted by LittleStarYou said you can’t be racist AGAINST whites.Posted by SupesYou can be discriminated against, but that is different from racism.Posted by LittleStarHold the boat.Posted by SupesYou can’t be racist against whites.Posted by LittleStarThat’s one of the most racist things I’ve ever read.Posted by SupesDude the kid didn’t make the choice to not have their bio parents and they didn’t make the choice to be adopted. It is literally something forced upon them by a system or people.
And what I think is the most hypocritical thing on this post is that another black child is taken off the streets, educated, fed, loved, wants for nothing and someone still ain’t happy!
It’s like “fuck the child of color” look at this white devil raising him!
If the world cared more about solving the problems that cause children to need to be adopted on a large scale and focused less on how nice is it to adopt for whatever self centered reason i.e. can’t have kids and desperately need one, want to save a kid, etc for their own personal gain then there wouldn’t be as many kids out there without parents. Focusing on disease control, war, and allowing bio parents support and lack of prejudiced systems is the best solution.
The only real necessary reason for adoption is if the bio parents are total shits and need to be out of the picture. Every adoption is making the best of an utter tragedy.
And if whites hadn’t ravaged most of the world a lot of adoptions would have been prevented because their cultures wouldn’t have been disrupted. Obviously there are shit rules that are out of our hands like China’s past, but if those things get addressed like I said, it would prevent the need for this disconnect in the first place.
So, if someone chooses to adopt it’s considered self centered and for personal gain?
And how on gods green earth are whites responsible for the amount of children up for adoption?
Most people only choose to adopt either for the fact they can’t have their own or they want to get some kind of satisfaction/emotional reward for doing something nice. There are few that do it without those things present.
And whites have started wars, colonized countries and then left them in shambles which caused more issues, they started widespread slavery in many countries and spread diseases which wiped out whole populations. Those things still happened locally on a global scale. But those in power who happened to be white created most of it. From the 1700/1800s on.
Are you saying that I can’t be offended or wronged if I’m discriminated against because of my skin tone?
Because if that’s what you’re saying, you’re absolutely wrong.
Be offended away. It’s your right.
It’s goes hand in hand from a (non white) mouthclick to expand
No exact time of birth?
Can't tell if the person is actually a Cap moon or he could be something else. Plus houses are important to see what sort of influence the placements will be under. Can't see the houses in this chart cos there's no exact time of birth.
Can't tell if the person is actually a Cap moon or he could be something else. Plus houses are important to see what sort of influence the placements will be under. Can't see the houses in this chart cos there's no exact time of birth.
Posted by CaramelizedCoffee
I agree with this thread. Leo moon is a force of nature though. We just don't give a fuk
Why i think it can't ever work with a scorpio moon cause we're either shitting right back or icing them out
I can't lie though the only guy who ever meant anything to me was a virgo with a scorp moon
But honestly I'm not nice enough to cater to one dysfunction
Plus he was emotionally selfish. Only on his own timing. Leo moons needs a ride or die
So it'll never work out
Plus scorpio energy is shady with their passive aggressive attacks
If you notice most scorpio users or scorp moons are shady as hell. They'll be nice to you but then throw you under the bus with a comment
They're almost as bad as aries moons
Can I have your moon? Mine sucks because I always want things to be passive and peaceful...
Signed Up: Jul 28, 2016
Comments: 4222 · Posts: 6474 · Topics: 83
Comments: 4222 · Posts: 6474 · Topics: 83
Posted by LittleStarWhat is your solution. That all races go back to their prospective countries and live out their lives and future generations never leave said countries? Leave all the whits to fuck up their own shit. Leave all Indians to fuck up their own shit. Leave all blacks to fuck up their own shit and so on and so onPosted by QueenofthepheasantfairiesNah. I don’t see how Ancient Rome or Vikings were oppressed. They did oppressing and waged war. But they haven’t been victims of a large scale oppression.Posted by LittleStarumm. Ancient Rome. The vikings... It's there trust me.Posted by SupesName whites that have had systems in place to discriminate against them as a whole through out the past 300 years.Posted by LittleStarYou said you can’t be racist AGAINST whites.Posted by SupesYou can be discriminated against, but that is different from racism.Posted by LittleStarHold the boat.Posted by SupesYou can’t be racist against whites.Posted by LittleStarThat’s one of the most racist things I’ve ever read.Posted by SupesDude the kid didn’t make the choice to not have their bio parents and they didn’t make the choice to be adopted. It is literally something forced upon them by a system or people.
And what I think is the most hypocritical thing on this post is that another black child is taken off the streets, educated, fed, loved, wants for nothing and someone still ain’t happy!
It’s like “fuck the child of color” look at this white devil raising him!
If the world cared more about solving the problems that cause children to need to be adopted on a large scale and focused less on how nice is it to adopt for whatever self centered reason i.e. can’t have kids and desperately need one, want to save a kid, etc for their own personal gain then there wouldn’t be as many kids out there without parents. Focusing on disease control, war, and allowing bio parents support and lack of prejudiced systems is the best solution.
The only real necessary reason for adoption is if the bio parents are total shits and need to be out of the picture. Every adoption is making the best of an utter tragedy.
And if whites hadn’t ravaged most of the world a lot of adoptions would have been prevented because their cultures wouldn’t have been disrupted. Obviously there are shit rules that are out of our hands like China’s past, but if those things get addressed like I said, it would prevent the need for this disconnect in the first place.
So, if someone chooses to adopt it’s considered self centered and for personal gain?
And how on gods green earth are whites responsible for the amount of children up for adoption?
Most people only choose to adopt either for the fact they can’t have their own or they want to get some kind of satisfaction/emotional reward for doing something nice. There are few that do it without those things present.
And whites have started wars, colonized countries and then left them in shambles which caused more issues, they started widespread slavery in many countries and spread diseases which wiped out whole populations. Those things still happened locally on a global scale. But those in power who happened to be white created most of it. From the 1700/1800s on.
Are you saying that I can’t be offended or wronged if I’m discriminated against because of my skin tone?
Because if that’s what you’re saying, you’re absolutely wrong.
Be offended away. It’s your right.
It’s goes hand in hand from a (non white) mouthclick to expand
or is it our attitude towards people and moving forward the solution. Do you think there will not be any oppression at all if we were all one color?
Survival is overrated.